Re: Proposal for a non-periodic CPRNG (WARNING: CROSSPOST!)
- From: Phoenix <ribeiroalvo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 05:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
On 29 Abr, 02:39, Sebastian Garth <sebastianga...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Sebastian.
Keep it up. Only three things:
1. 3 million output bits per second, seems to me very slowly.
2. The ENT program alone is not enough to make cryptanalysis.
4. Try to make a description of the scheme in pseudo code.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal for a non-periodic CPRNG (WARNING: CROSSPOST!)
- From: Sebastian Garth
- Re: Proposal for a non-periodic CPRNG (WARNING: CROSSPOST!)
- References:
- Proposal for a non-periodic CPRNG (WARNING: CROSSPOST!)
- From: Sebastian Garth
- Proposal for a non-periodic CPRNG (WARNING: CROSSPOST!)
- Prev by Date: Proposal for a non-periodic CPRNG (WARNING: CROSSPOST!)
- Next by Date: Re: Proposal for a non-periodic CPRNG (WARNING: CROSSPOST!)
- Previous by thread: Proposal for a non-periodic CPRNG (WARNING: CROSSPOST!)
- Next by thread: Re: Proposal for a non-periodic CPRNG (WARNING: CROSSPOST!)
- Index(es):
