Re: Not looking like a fool
- From: Earl_Colby_Pottinger <earlcolby.pottinger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 06:50:43 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 2, 12:38 am, FigureItOut <LocusPo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:26:23 -0800, Mycelium
<mycel...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:16:50 -0800, VelCrowPhly
<VelCrowP...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So, does that mean that he FOOked up?
He FOOked around a lot!
Okay, I am trying to figure out if you guys are just a little on the
weird side, or a lot older than me ie nursing home old! :)
I mean, cartoons from the 1930's I was not even born till 1956, my
brain can't handle how they thought that far back in time. :)
Did you guys grow up reading this stuff? It would explain a lot. :)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Not looking like a fool
- From: FigureItOut
- Re: Not looking like a fool
- References:
- Re: Not looking like a fool
- From: VelCrowPhly
- Re: Not looking like a fool
- From: Mycelium
- Re: Not looking like a fool
- From: FigureItOut
- Re: Not looking like a fool
- Prev by Date: Re: Proving knowledge of a message with a given SHA-1 without disclosing it?
- Next by Date: Re: Not looking like a fool
- Previous by thread: Re: Not looking like a fool
- Next by thread: Re: Not looking like a fool
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|