Re: For Paulo (and anyone else bored enough)
- From: Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Oct 2011 00:39:26 +0300
Earl_Colby_Pottinger <earlcolby.pottinger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Oct 25, 7:32 am, Paulo Marques <pmarq...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I actually was planning on not making more than one post every couple of
weeks (I only made 2 posts like that so far and there were much more
posts from adacrypt), so that newcomers could figure out quickly that
the posts don't contain valuable information.
But I don't have a strong opinion about it, and you're not the first
person to say that I shouldn't do it, so I'll stop it now.
I see nothing wrong with you posting once a week, biweekly, monthly
just to point out that he is a kook who will try moving the goalposts
rather than do a honest test of his system.
Particularly if the goal is to get into people's killfiles. That's
a great way to go about it, ensuring there's no signal in any posts.
Phil
--
Unix is simple. It just takes a genius to understand its simplicity
-- Dennis Ritchie (1941-2011), Unix Co-Creator
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: For Paulo (and anyone else bored enough)
- From: Earl_Colby_Pottinger
- Re: For Paulo (and anyone else bored enough)
- References:
- [adacrypt] For Paulo (and anyone else bored enough)
- From: Owen Jacobson
- Re: [adacrypt] For Paulo (and anyone else bored enough)
- From: Paulo Marques
- Re: For Paulo (and anyone else bored enough)
- From: Earl_Colby_Pottinger
- [adacrypt] For Paulo (and anyone else bored enough)
- Prev by Date: Re: Some expert opinions request.
- Next by Date: hacking email/web pws
- Previous by thread: Re: For Paulo (and anyone else bored enough)
- Next by thread: Re: For Paulo (and anyone else bored enough)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|