Re: The Most Profound Distillation of the Feedack from Modern Cyptography.
- From: John Nagle <nagle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:12:03 -0700
On 9/22/2011 10:05 AM, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On 11-09-22 11:36 AM, Prof Craver wrote:
All he's saying is that mathematically impossible encryption will
remain mathematically impossible as long as digital computers are
digital.
Ah. So he is pointing out that computers must represent numbers using
finite representations. Therefore all numbers that computers use are
countable.
Technically that's a true statement.
Indeed, but he seems to see this as a problem (and presumably thinks
that he has a solution to the "problem").
Usually I run into those people criticizing proof of correctness on
the grounds of undecidability. I didn't know they were into cryptography, too.
Historically, there were some analog encryption schemes for
voice and video. They tended to suffer from "residual intelligibility"; some sense of the content still got through.
Turing once proposed using a device which did an analog modular
add to add a random noise stream to audio. The receiving end could then
reverse the operation and decrypt. Keeping the noise streams (one time
keys on phonograph records) in sync was too hard to do with 1940s
technology, so that idea didn't work out. This is not SIGSALY;
that was a competing digital system, with 15 racks of tube gear.
Turing knew about that and was trying to design something simpler.
There's no cryptographic advantage in doing this in analog.
Turing was just trying to get the system tube count down.
John Nagle
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- The Most Profound Distillation of the Feedack from Modern Cyptography.
- From: adacrypt
- Re: The Most Profound Distillation of the Feedack from Modern Cyptography.
- From: WTShaw
- Re: The Most Profound Distillation of the Feedack from Modern Cyptography.
- From: Prof Craver
- Re: The Most Profound Distillation of the Feedack from Modern Cyptography.
- From: Jeffrey Goldberg
- The Most Profound Distillation of the Feedack from Modern Cyptography.
- Prev by Date: Re: Signing and encrypting software
- Next by Date: Re: The Most Profound Distillation of the Feedack from Modern Cyptography.
- Previous by thread: Re: The Most Profound Distillation of the Feedack from Modern Cyptography.
- Next by thread: Re: The Most Profound Distillation of the Feedack from Modern Cyptography.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|