Re: Off Base Possibilites
 From: biject <biject.bwts@xxxxxxxxx>
 Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:26:21 0700 (PDT)
On Jun 17, 4:14 pm, WTShaw <lure...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If characters are input from a 100 character set, by converting to
base 16, three original characters are represented by 20 bits, 6 2/3
bits per character. Normally it would be 21 bits, 3x7 as a minimum.
Some of the ASCII artifact is also gone and unscrambling a set of 100
characters with little amounts of data would be a bear as not being as
easy as linear.
6.66666...
while 100 character could be thought of
as ln(100) / ln(2) = 6.64385619
you could have used 101 characters
ln(101) / ln(2) = 6.65821148
this would still fight in 20 bits
If you allow first character from 101 values
and second from l01 values you could use
102 values for the third character since
you only need
(ln(102) / ln(2)) + (ln(101) / ln(2)) + (ln(101) / ln(2)) = 19.9888483
bits
You can bijectively convert from the space of all binary files to
files that are only made up of your set of 100 characters.
You could encrypt using your standard Grand View methods and then
convert bijectively back to binary or even 5 letter random looking
groupings with letters AtoZ. Of course I was doing this I would
throw in a BWTS somewhere. This would also require the use of
computers this would not be something that could be hand done.
Just a thought
for 101 characters value from 0 to 100 for x1 x2 and x3
n = (x1 * 101 + x2)*101 + x3
let
a = n / 101
x3 = remainder of n/101
x2 = remainder of a/101
x1 = a/101
for 20 bits low = 0 high = 1,048,575
highest value needed is
(100 * 101 + 100) * 101 + 100 = 1,030,300
if x3 has 102 values divide first time by 102
this gives max value of n as
(100*101 + 100)*102 + 101 = 1,040,501
David A. Scott

My Crypto code
http://bijective.dogma.net/crypto/scott19u.zip
http://www.jim.com/jamesd/Kong/scott19u.zip old version
My Compression code http://bijective.dogma.net/
**TO EMAIL ME drop the roman "five" **
Disclaimer:I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
made in the above text. For all I know I might be drugged.
As a famous person once said "any cryptograhic
system is only as strong as its weakest link"
.
 FollowUps:
 Re: Off Base Possibilites
 From: WTShaw
 Re: Off Base Possibilites
 References:
 Off Base Possibilites
 From: WTShaw
 Re: Off Base Possibilites
 From: WTShaw
 Off Base Possibilites
 Prev by Date: Re: Dedicated hash systems vs block ciphers with CBC?
 Next by Date: Re: Off Base Possibilites
 Previous by thread: Re: Off Base Possibilites
 Next by thread: Re: Off Base Possibilites
 Index(es):
Relevant Pages
