Re: Analyses of scrypt
- From: kg <kristiag+news@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 21:48:41 +0000 (UTC)
Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey+news@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11-05-10 6:03 AM, Francois Grieu wrote:
No pointers. But scrypt is *demonstrably* secure (or next to that) thus
there won't be a cryptanalysis. Rest assured on that. There could still
be attacks on a poor implementation, though.
I would be pleased with pointers to professionals saying that it is
demonstrably secure.
You didn't get a pointer to a professional saying that, you got a
professional saying that.
I haven't read the scrypt paper in detail, but it seems credible.
--
kg
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Analyses of scrypt
- From: Jeffrey Goldberg
- Re: Analyses of scrypt
- References:
- Analyses of scrypt
- From: Jeffrey Goldberg
- Re: Analyses of scrypt
- From: Francois Grieu
- Re: Analyses of scrypt
- From: Jeffrey Goldberg
- Analyses of scrypt
- Prev by Date: Re: Zimmermann's zfone not at site
- Next by Date: Re: Zimmermann's zfone not at site
- Previous by thread: Re: Analyses of scrypt
- Next by thread: Re: Analyses of scrypt
- Index(es):