Re: Ref. of a new method of stego on hard drive
- From: Prof Craver <xcottcraver@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 07:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 26, 2:28 pm, Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.s...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Lacking knowledge, I am not yet clear how strongly that kind of evidence
could be employed e.g. to incriminate a person in court, since it would
be hard to state what is the 'natural' statistical distribution, I
guess.
This should be more than enough evidence to convince a judge that
encrypted data is there, especially if the embedding software is found
on the computer. The probability of such a pattern appearing on a
drive by accident is far too low to explain it away; you might as well
encrypt your files normally, and then claim that the ciphertext is
just a file of random data that coincidentally resembles ciphertext.
--S
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ref. of a new method of stego on hard drive
- From: Mok-Kong Shen
- Re: Ref. of a new method of stego on hard drive
- References:
- Ref. of a new method of stego on hard drive
- From: Mok-Kong Shen
- Re: Ref. of a new method of stego on hard drive
- From: Prof Craver
- Re: Ref. of a new method of stego on hard drive
- From: Mok-Kong Shen
- Ref. of a new method of stego on hard drive
- Prev by Date: Re: Collisions and preimages in a specific compression function
- Next by Date: Re: Ref. of a new method of stego on hard drive
- Previous by thread: Re: Ref. of a new method of stego on hard drive
- Next by thread: Re: Ref. of a new method of stego on hard drive
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|