Re: Mathematical Functions not Needed
- From: Thomas <thomas.beneteau@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:38:08 -0800 (PST)
....the same depending on how I handle floating point support. And in
cryptography, this is a no-go.
- floating-point arithmetic is SLOW
- continuous mathematics is horribly well-defined, while cryptography
needs irregularity. This is provided to an extent in discrete
mathematics, as far as we know.
So, overall, the real number line is *not* the desktop of all number-
theoretic cryptography, and will never be. So now just shut the hell
up and stop posting your crap on the net, because you're not helping
anyone.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mathematical Functions not Needed
- From: Jeffrey Goldberg
- Re: Mathematical Functions not Needed
- References:
- Mathematical Functions not Needed
- From: adacrypt
- Re: Mathematical Functions not Needed
- From: rossum
- Mathematical Functions not Needed
- Prev by Date: Re: Mathematical Functions not Needed
- Next by Date: Re: Trying to get some feedback on this authentication/encryption protocol
- Previous by thread: Re: Mathematical Functions not Needed
- Next by thread: Re: Mathematical Functions not Needed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|