Re: scott19u.zip real key length
- From: David Eather <eather@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:25:27 +1000
On 27/12/2010 10:04 AM, Fritz Wuehler wrote:
How efficient! I think I'll stick with AES which doesn't suffer from any
of these drawbacks ;)
Yeah it just suffers from the drawback that it has a neat and tidy algebraic
representation (see Schneier). Bad crypto, bad!
And you can exploit this how?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: scott19u.zip real key length
- From: Kulin Remailer
- Re: scott19u.zip real key length
- References:
- Re: scott19u.zip real key length
- From: Dave -Turner
- Re: scott19u.zip real key length
- From: Fritz Wuehler
- Re: scott19u.zip real key length
- Prev by Date: Re: scott19u.zip real key length
- Next by Date: Compression and UNICITY DISTANCE
- Previous by thread: Re: scott19u.zip real key length
- Next by thread: Re: scott19u.zip real key length
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|