Re: Chosen plaintext attacks
- From: rossum <rossum48@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 22:46:59 +0100
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 05:18:31 -0700 (PDT), JT
<jonas.thornvall@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well everyone should forever remember that rossum said OTP to beYour ignorance is showing. The OTP can always resist a known
useless, they do not resist a known plaintext attack.
JT
plaintext attack. Stream cyphers may not be able to resist. It is
the ability to resist that helps us separate the secure stream cyphers
from the insecure stream cyphers.
You didn't bother to calculate unicity distances for the OTP and for
your cypher did you? Had you done so you would not make such obvious
errors.
rossum
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Chosen plaintext attacks
- From: JT
- Re: Chosen plaintext attacks
- References:
- Chosen plaintext attacks
- From: JT
- Re: Chosen plaintext attacks
- From: Joseph Ashwood
- Re: Chosen plaintext attacks
- From: JT
- Re: Chosen plaintext attacks
- From: Joseph Ashwood
- Re: Chosen plaintext attacks
- From: JT
- Re: Chosen plaintext attacks
- From: rossum
- Re: Chosen plaintext attacks
- From: JT
- Chosen plaintext attacks
- Prev by Date: Re: Chosen plaintext attacks
- Next by Date: How secure is your e-mail password?
- Previous by thread: Re: Chosen plaintext attacks
- Next by thread: Re: Chosen plaintext attacks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|