Re: Binary code
- From: WTShaw <lurens1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 04:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 31, 1:34 am, Ertugrul Söylemez <e...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nick Cramer <n_cramerS...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
132 ! Count on your fingers in binary. Unmistakable message!
It's a sad truth that 99% of sci.crypt traffic is irrelevant, useless
and not funny. In your case it's old, too. Great as a joke in a closed
group of nerds, not so great when supporting Usenet spam.
Greets,
Ertugrul
--
nightmare = unsafePerformIO (getWrongWife >>= sex)http://blog.ertes.de/
1011001 1100001 1100100 1100100 1100001 0101100 0100000 1011001
1100001 1100100 1100100 1100001 0101100 0100000 1011001 1100001
1100100 1100100 1100001 0101110
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
- Next by Date: Re: How much cyber security is really there?
- Previous by thread: Re: How much cyber security is really there?
- Next by thread: Re: Request to Use and Abuse My SHA512 Program
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
