sci.crypt

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Mark-Up Cryptography or Encapsulation Cryptography.
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Mark-Up Cryptography or Encapsulation Cryptography.
  • From: adacrypt
• Re: Mark-Up Cryptography or Encapsulation Cryptography.
  • From: adacrypt
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Chambal et al
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Mark-Up Cryptography or Encapsulation Cryptography.
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Mark-Up Cryptography or Encapsulation Cryptography.
  • From: adacrypt
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Mark-Up Cryptography or Encapsulation Cryptography.
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Mark-Up Cryptography or Encapsulation Cryptography.
  • From: adacrypt
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Bryan
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Bryan
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Maaartin
• CFP Applied Computing 2010: submissions until 28 May 2010
  • From: natty2006@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Chambal et al
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: MrD
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Bryan
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Public Key Size in ECDSA
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Antispam strategies
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Public Key Size in ECDSA
  • From: Eddie
• Re: Antispam strategies
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Antispam strategies
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: bad client public DH value
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Antispam strategies
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Antispam strategies
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Antispam strategies
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Scripting Ciphers.
  • From: adacrypt
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Bryan
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Antispam strategies
  • From: unruh
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Antispam strategies
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Steganography Software
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Steganography Software
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: bad client public DH value
  • From: Ertugrul Söylemez
• Re: Antispam strategies
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• bad client public DH value
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Public/Public
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Steganography Software
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Bryan
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Steganography Software
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: Stewart Malik
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: Stewart Malik
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: Alias
• Re: Steganography Software
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Steganography Software
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Steganography Software
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Steganography Software
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Steganography Software
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Bootstraps on Steroids
  • From: WTShaw
• Steganography Software
  • From: jmorton123
• Re: Public/Public
  • From: unruh
• Re: Call for review: Hashing by hand algorithm
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: An application of indirectness and variability
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Public/Public
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Bootstraps on Steroids
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: An application of indirectness and variability
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Bootstraps on Steroids
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: An application of indirectness and variability
  • From: WTShaw
• An application of indirectness and variability
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PE Scrambler
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PE Scrambler
  • From: Ertugrul Söylemez
• Re: PE Scrambler
  • From: balzer
• Re: PE Scrambler
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PE Scrambler
  • From: balzer
• Re: Public/Public
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Bootstraps on Steroids
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Bootstraps on Steroids
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Bootstraps on Steroids
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: PE Scrambler
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Public/Public
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: PE Scrambler
  • From: unruh
• PE Scrambler
  • From: balzer
• Re: Public/Public
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Dynamic Hill cipher
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Public/Public
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Security theatre?
  • From: bmearns
• Security theatre?
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: unique pemutation using 3DES
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Are online password managers safe to use?
  • From: bmearns
• Re: unique pemutation using 3DES
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Are online password managers safe to use?
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Are online password managers safe to use?
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Australian Crypto Regulations
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Bootstraps on Steroids
  • From: Earl_Colby_Pottinger
• Re: Bootstraps on Steroids
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Australian Crypto Regulations
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Bootstraps on Steroids
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: unique pemutation using 3DES
  • From: J.D.
• Re: unique pemutation using 3DES
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: entropy and the Yarrow PRNG for key generation
  • From: unruh
• Re: unique pemutation using 3DES
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• unique pemutation using 3DES
  • From: marvind434
• Re: entropy and the Yarrow PRNG for key generation
  • From: Peter Pearson
• entropy and the Yarrow PRNG for key generation
  • From: Michael
• Re: Are online password managers safe to use?
  • From: unruh
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Are online password managers safe to use?
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Are online password managers safe to use?
  • From: Doc O'Leary
• Re: Bootstraps on Steroids
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Bootstraps on Steroids
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Are online password managers safe to use?
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: Explicit Encapsulation Within the Ciphertext or Implicit Markup Database.
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Are online password managers safe to use?
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: bmearns
• Bootstraps on Steroids
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Are online password managers safe to use?
  • From: Ohm
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Explicit Encapsulation Within the Ciphertext or Implicit Markup Database.
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• Re: Are online password managers safe to use?
  • From: Dave -Turner
• Re: Explicit Encapsulation Within the Ciphertext or Implicit Markup Database.
  • From: rossum
• Re: Shamir's Identity Based Encryption -- consensus
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: Explicit Encapsulation Within the Ciphertext or Implicit Markup Database.
  • From: adacrypt
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: bmearns
• Are online password managers safe to use?
  • From: Ohm
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Explicit Encapsulation Within the Ciphertext or Implicit Markup Database.
  • From: adacrypt
• Shamir's Identity Based Encryption -- consensus
  • From: Argo
• Re: Explicit Encapsulation Within the Ciphertext or Implicit Markup Database.
  • From: adacrypt
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
  • From: Bryan
• Re: Explicit Encapsulation Within the Ciphertext or Implicit Markup Database.
  • From: adacrypt
• Re: Trying to explain A, B and C in Cryptology
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Australian Crypto Regulations
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Asymmetric key length recommendations
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Asymmetric key length recommendations
  • From: Bryan
• Re: Asymmetric key length recommendations
  • From: Nomen Nescio
• Re: Explicit Encapsulation Within the Ciphertext or Implicit Markup Database.
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Trying to explain A, B and C in Cryptology
  • From: amzoti
• Re: Explicit Encapsulation Within the Ciphertext or Implicit Markup Database.
  • From: Richard Outerbridge
• Re: Australian Crypto Regulations
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Asymmetric key length recommendations
  • From: unruh
• Explicit Encapsulation Within the Ciphertext or Implicit Markup Database.
  • From: adacrypt
• Re: Australian Crypto Regulations
  • From: unruh
• Re: Asymmetric key length recommendations
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Asymmetric key length recommendations
  • From: Non scrivetemi
• Re: Australian Crypto Regulations
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Australian Crypto Regulations
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
  • From: WTShaw
• Trying to explain A, B and C in Cryptology
  • From: Jesper Angelo
• Re: Asymmetric key length recommendations
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Asymmetric key length recommendations
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Asymmetric key length recommendations
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Asymmetric key length recommendations
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Asymmetric key length recommendations
  • From: Jens Stuckelberger
• Asymmetric key length recommendations
  • From: Nomen Nescio
• Re: Australian Crypto Regulations
  • From: starwars
• Re: Australian Crypto Regulations
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Australian Crypto Regulations
  • From: MK1024
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Australian Crypto Regulations
  • From: unruh
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Australian Crypto Regulations
  • From: amzoti
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Antispam strategies
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Australian Crypto Regulations
  • From: Dave -Turner
• Australian Crypto Regulations
  • From: MK1024
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Practical applications still using DES
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: Practical applications still using DES
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Practical applications still using DES
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Practical applications still using DES
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Re: The key to cracking any cipher: Elephant.
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Practical applications still using DES
  • From: Thomas ***in
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: HTTP and HTTPS sessions question
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Practical applications still using DES
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Practical applications still using DES
  • From: unruh
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: HTTP and HTTPS sessions question
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Bryan
• Re: Practical applications still using DES
  • From: Thomas ***in
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Practical applications still using DES
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: HTTP and HTTPS sessions question
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: HTTP and HTTPS sessions question
  • From: mike clark
• Re: HTTP and HTTPS sessions question
  • From: balzer
• Re: HTTP and HTTPS sessions question
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: why does PKCS#1 use the LCM instead of Euler's totient function?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: why does PKCS#1 use the LCM instead of Euler's totient function?
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: why does PKCS#1 use the LCM instead of Euler's totient function?
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• why does PKCS#1 use the LCM instead of Euler's totient function?
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Practical applications still using DES
  • From: Brashen
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Associative hash function
  • From: Francois Grieu
• HTTP and HTTPS sessions question
  • From: balzer
• Associative hash function
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: "new algo" ????
  • From: remy
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Very basic questions
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: TrueCrypt broken
  • From: nemo_outis
• Re: PGP question
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: TrueCrypt broken
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: David Eather
• Re: PGP question
  • From: Bryan
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: bmearns
• Re: "new algo" ????
  • From: remy
• Re: "new algo" ????
  • From: remy
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: PGP question
  • From: David Eather
• PGP question
  • From: Binary
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: unruh
• Re: Unlimited Key Length Random Binary Number Generator with Video Tutorial
  • From: jmorton123
• Re: Very basic questions
  • From: Richard Outerbridge
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: Very basic questions
  • From: jmorton123
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Richard Outerbridge
• Re: Computer Bunker
  • From: Globemaker
• Re: Computer Bunker
  • From: jbriggs444
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: bmearns
• Re: "new algo" ????
  • From: remy
• Re: "new algo" ????
  • From: Noob
• Re: "new algo" ????
  • From: remy
• Re: "new algo" ????
  • From: remy
• Re: "new algo" ????
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: "new algo" ????
  • From: remy
• Re: "new algo" ????
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: "new algo" ????
  • From: remy
• Re: "new algo" ????
  • From: remy
• Re: "new algo" ????
  • From: remy
• Re: "new algo" ????
  • From: remy
• Re: "new algo" ????
  • From: remy
• Re: "new algo" ????
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• "new algo" ????
  • From: remy
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: unruh
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: unruh
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: unruh
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: Antispam strategies
  • From: unruh
• Re: If we could factor large numbers quickly, how exactly does everything break?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Antispam strategies
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: unruh
• Re: Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Unlimited Key Length Random Binary Number Generator with Video Tutorial
  • From: WTShaw
• Permutations and calculated strength in bits
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Richard Outerbridge
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: Richard Outerbridge
• Re: If we could factor large numbers quickly, how exactly does everything break?
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: A link on North Korean home-grwon OS
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• A link on North Korean home-grwon OS
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: If we could factor large numbers quickly, how exactly does everything break?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Unlimited Key Length Random Binary Number Generator with Video Tutorial
  • From: jmorton123
• Randomness: All you'll ever need to know
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: TrueCrypt broken
  • From: Anne Onime
• Re: If we could factor large numbers quickly, how exactly does everything break?
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: TrueCrypt broken
  • From: Xavier Roche
• TrueCrypt broken
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• close encounters
  • From: dennyreno
• Re: What do you think of this Blowfish implementation?
  • From: Ertugrul Söylemez
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Operator Protocols for using a PRF
  • From: bmearns
• Re: What do you think of this Blowfish implementation?
  • From: rossum
• Re: What do you think of this Blowfish implementation?
  • From: Paulo Marques
• Re: Operator Protocols for using a PRF
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Computer Bunker
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Decoding string
  • From: Binary
• Re: What do you think of this Blowfish implementation?
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: What do you think of this Blowfish implementation?
  • From: unruh
• Re: What do you think of this Blowfish implementation?
  • From: Sal
• Re: What do you think of this Blowfish implementation?
  • From: unruh
• What do you think of this Blowfish implementation?
  • From: Sal
• Re: Computer Bunker
  • From: Earl_Colby_Pottinger
• Re: Operator Protocols for using a PRF
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Computer Bunker
  • From: Globemaker
• Re: Operator Protocols for using a PRF
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Operator Protocols for using a PRF
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Collecting true randomness from natural language texts
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Collecting true randomness from natural language texts
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Computer Bunker
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Collecting true randomness from natural language texts
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Gollin Lied, Babies Died
  • From: moe zarella
• Re: Collecting true randomness from natural language texts
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Request to Use and Abuse My SHA512 Program
  • From: David T. Ashley
• Computer Bunker
  • From: Globemaker
• Re: Collecting true randomness from natural language texts
  • From: unruh
• Re: Collecting true randomness from natural language texts
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Operator Protocols for using a PRF
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Operator Protocols for using a PRF
  • From: Noob
• Re: Collecting true randomness/entropy from decimal part of the values calculated in stock exchange market
  • From: ttw6687@xxxxxxx
• Re: Operator Protocols for using a PRF
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Collecting true randomness from natural language texts
  • From: Maaartin
• Collecting true randomness/entropy from decimal part of the values calculated in stock exchange market
  • From: Phoenix
• Re: Collecting true randomness from natural language texts
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Collecting true randomness from natural language texts
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Collecting true randomness from natural language texts
  • From: unruh
• Re: Collecting true randomness from natural language texts
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Collecting true randomness from natural language texts
  • From: Earl_Colby_Pottinger
• Re: Collecting true randomness from natural language texts
  • From: unruh
• Re: If we could factor large numbers quickly, how exactly does everything break?
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Collecting true randomness from natural language texts
  • From: Earl_Colby_Pottinger
• Re: If we could factor large numbers quickly, how exactly does everything break?
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: If we could factor large numbers quickly, how exactly does everything break?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Where are the FIPS 140-1 tests for randomness now?
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: If we could factor large numbers quickly, how exactly does everything break?
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Where are the FIPS 140-1 tests for randomness now?
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
  • From: David Eather
• Collecting true randomness from natural language texts
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• UIUC Professor’s Role in Liberian Shakedown Scheme
  • From: Rudolph deRednosedreindeer
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: What Are People Saying About U of Illinois Physics Prof George Gollin?
  • From: WTShaw
• What Are People Saying About U of Illinois Physics Prof George Gollin?
  • From: Rudolph deRednosedreindeer
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
  • From: David Eather
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: spinner
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: If we could factor large numbers quickly, how exactly does everything break?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Where are the FIPS 140-1 tests for randomness now?
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Where are the FIPS 140-1 tests for randomness now?
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: unruh
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: unruh
• Re: Where are the FIPS 140-1 tests for randomness now?
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: digital signature without hashing?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Where are the FIPS 140-1 tests for randomness now?
  • From: amzoti
• 6th Int. Conf. on Technology and Medical Sciences – Announce & Call for Papers
  • From: tavares@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF)
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: WTShaw
• Where are the FIPS 140-1 tests for randomness now?
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Decoding string
  • From: Maaartin
• George Gollin's Liberian Shakedown Role Revealed In Court Docs
  • From: moe zarella
• Re: Decoding string
  • From: Globemaker
• Re: Hardware RNG
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Decoding string
  • From: rossum
• Re: Updating the Historic OTP.
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Updating the Historic OTP.
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Updating the Historic OTP.
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: If we could factor large numbers quickly, how exactly does everything break?
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: If we could factor large numbers quickly, how exactly does everything break?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: bmearns
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF)
  • From: bmearns
• Operator Protocols for using a PRF
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Updating the Historic OTP.
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Decoding string
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: unruh
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: unruh
• Re: Decoding string
  • From: Globemaker
• Re: Decoding string
  • From: Binary
• Re: Decoding string
  • From: Globemaker
• Re: Decoding string
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Decoding string
  • From: Binary
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: unruh
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Request to Use and Abuse My SHA512 Program
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Request to Use and Abuse My SHA512 Program
  • From: Thomas ***in
• Re: If we could factor large numbers quickly, how exactly does everything break?
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Updating the Historic OTP.
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Binary code
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Updating the Historic OTP.
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: Updating the Historic OTP.
  • From: WTShaw
• Re: How much cyber security is really there?
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: If we could factor large numbers quickly, how exactly does everything break?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Updating the Historic OTP.
  • From: J.D.
• Re: Updating the Historic OTP.
  • From: Sebastian Garth
• Re: Permutation Extrapolation Function (PXF) (you might find the end of the post useful)
  • From: David Eather

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• News
• Mailing-Lists
• Newsgroups
• Service
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

www.derkeiler.com  > Newsgroups  > sci.crypt  > 2010-04