Re: A poorman's block encryption algorithm
- From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:24:59 +0100
Maaartin wrote:
There's a problem with polynomials you was already told about: They
propagate only towards higher bits (unless you use non-power of two
modulus which is slow). So you can be sure, that a couple of least
significant bits can be found out easily, no matter how many rounds
you do. Starting from them, higher bit can be found, etc. I already
recomennded a remedy, so use it or find another.
Extremely sorry for my poor memory. Could you kindly sketch your remedy
once again or provide a pointer? Concerning predictability of
congruential PRNGs, I previously suggested to use (pseudo-random)
cyclic shift of bits in computer words of the output as a counter-
measure. That could also be done in the present context.
Thanks,
M. K. Shen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A poorman's block encryption algorithm
- From: Maaartin
- Re: A poorman's block encryption algorithm
- References:
- A poorman's block encryption algorithm
- From: Mok-Kong Shen
- Re: A poorman's block encryption algorithm
- From: Maaartin
- A poorman's block encryption algorithm
- Prev by Date: Re: A poorman's block encryption algorithm
- Next by Date: Re: Why is Kerberos ever used, rather than modern public key cryptography?
- Previous by thread: Re: A poorman's block encryption algorithm
- Next by thread: Re: A poorman's block encryption algorithm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|