Re: length of pw
- From: Ertugrul Söylemez <es@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:35:51 +0100
bmearns <mearns.b@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
For anyone else reading this thread, the point is that an alphabet
containing more letters means each letter represents more information,
and is therefore more difficult to remember. I'm not saying it's
impossible, obviously, but a 5 character password from an alphabet of
several hundred characters (for example) is both safer and harder to
memorize than a 5 character English-alphabet password.
Yes, and also note that increasing the length of a password has much
greater effect than increasing the size of the alphabet.
Greets
Ertugrul
--
nightmare = unsafePerformIO (getWrongWife >>= sex)
http://blog.ertes.de/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: length of pw
- From: Phoenix
- Re: length of pw
- References:
- Re: length of pw
- From: Gomar
- Re: length of pw
- From: bmearns
- Re: length of pw
- Prev by Date: Re: Why shouldn't you ever reuse a stream cipher key?
- Next by Date: Re: Generic Crypto APIs ?
- Previous by thread: Re: length of pw
- Next by thread: Re: length of pw
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|