Re: GSM Encryption
- From: Maaartin <grajcar1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:32:07 -0800 (PST)
You are broadening the meaning of dictatorial to encompass almost
everything and the word loses all meaning.
Not really. It's dictatorial if one person who was not elected by
majority vote makes a decision that puts all those who WERE elected out
of power.
The following is surely OT for this already OT discussion, but what do
you think about this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y2VrhjWj9E&feature=player_embedded
.
- References:
- Re: GSM Encryption
- From: unruh
- Re: GSM Encryption
- From: Frank Merlott
- Re: GSM Encryption
- From: Peter Fairbrother
- Re: GSM Encryption
- From: unruh
- Re: GSM Encryption
- From: Bernd Felsche
- Re: GSM Encryption
- From: unruh
- Re: GSM Encryption
- Prev by Date: Re: Q: Kerchhoffs' principle
- Next by Date: Re: Q: Kerchhoffs' principle
- Previous by thread: Re: GSM Encryption
- Next by thread: Re: GSM Encryption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|