Re: Use of simple schemes
- From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:01:11 +0100
Another scheme that is also (theoretically) very simple but faírly
expensive in computing is, I suppose, Hill's scheme employing matrices.
Now the Hill cipher is said to be weak in textbooks because, if the
matrix is n*n and one has n^2 units of corresponding plain and cipher
text, then the matrix can be found and the whole thing broken. But one
could afford to use a good sufficiently fast PRNG to dynamically
generate as many matrices as needed, using even any one n*n matrix for
much less than n^2 units of plaintext, when the computing cost is low
and the speed is acceptable. This way, Hill's scheme would be
practically applicable (eventually as a component of a larger scheme)
in my humble view.
M. K. Shen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Use of simple schemes
- From: Maaartin
- Re: Use of simple schemes
- References:
- Use of simple schemes
- From: Mok-Kong Shen
- Use of simple schemes
- Prev by Date: Re: cryptography expert/programmer wanted - simple project
- Next by Date: Re: Simple pasword generator/reminder
- Previous by thread: Re: Use of simple schemes
- Next by thread: Re: Use of simple schemes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|