Re: JSH: But it just amazes me

JSH wrote:

Actually I isolated out a key part of the argument, wrote a paper and
submitted it to a mathematical journal which published it until some
sci.math posters mounted an email campaign against my paper which
spooked the editors who withdrew it against my wishes:
http://www.emis.de/journals/SWJPAM/vol2-03.html

cf. http://dl.free.fr/gMojEGqSw/jsh.pdf

So BY THE RULES that part of the argument was formally peer reviewed

You can't be sure your paper actually was formally peer reviewed.

Is the review process completely anonymous, or are the reviewers' names
disclosed at some point?

The journal later keeled over and died, but EMIS keeps its archives
up:
http://www.emis.de/journals/SWJPAM/

They also resurrected my paper though I don't bother linking to it, as
I've simplified and advanced the argument. You can simply do a search
in Google on: algebraic integer entanglement

You should write a new paper, and submit it to SWJPAM.

It just AMAZES me how Usenet posters can take the most dramatic things
and act like they're nothing.

As always, you are ever so easily amazed.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: Just plain silly
    ... I wrote the editors to inform them of an error. ... > commenting on the article CAME AFTER PUBLICATION.) ... I was not sent a copy of this review. ... with the exception of those who are fixated on trading insults with JSH, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: How did Einstein get published?
    ... one of the premier physics ... peer review did not become common until ... :> was definitely not reviewed by anyone but the editors. ... mathematical or physical basis for its defence. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: How did Einstein get published?
    ... one of the premier physics ... peer review did not become common until ... :> was definitely not reviewed by anyone but the editors. ... I think we can all agree Androcles is a 'tard:) ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: How did Einstein get published?
    ... :> Androcles in particular believes that Einstein's 1905 ... peer review did not become common until ... was definitely not reviewed by anyone but the editors. ... to travel from B to A' because I SAY SO. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: How did Einstein get published?
    ... was definitely not reviewed by anyone but the editors. ... For the record, in the paper, Einstein ... logical flaws, had they been there. ... Even with peer review, some flaws get published. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)