sci.crypt

• Thread Index

---

• IIT Kharagpur's annual techno management fest- KSHITIJ launches crpytex
  • From: Tarun Rathi
• Re: Noob question: P and S boxes
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: question about montgomery reductions
  • From: Tom St Denis
• question about montgomery reductions
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: Noob question: P and S boxes
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: SSL MIM attack
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Noob question: P and S boxes
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Giuliano Bertoletti
• Re: using smaller bases than possible so as to make use of the comba method?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: using smaller bases than possible so as to make use of the comba method?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• SSL MIM attack
  • From: Pierre Fichaud
• Re: using smaller bases than possible so as to make use of the comba method?
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: Noob question: P and S boxes
  • From: aerr0
• Noob question: P and S boxes
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: CatId
• Re: Strong 2048 bits block-cipher Algorithm
  • From: aerr0
• Re: using smaller bases than possible so as to make use of the comba method?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• using smaller bases than possible so as to make use of the comba method?
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Robert Scott
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Giuliano Bertoletti
• Re: The classical sliding alphabets
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Strong 2048 bits block-cipher Algorithm
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Decrypting ODS file, strange symptom
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: CRT for RSA
  • From: Mike Scott
• Re: CRT for RSA
  • From: Paul Rubin
• CRT for RSA
  • From: Rob Blank
• Re: Strengthening stream encryption processing
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Decrypting ODS file, strange symptom
  • From: Vaughn T
• Re: Decrypting ODS file, strange symptom
  • From: CatId
• Re: The classical sliding alphabets
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: A link with news on P vs NP
  • From: Noob
• Re: A link with news on P vs NP
  • From: Bartosz Zoltak
• Re: Strong 2048 bits block-cipher Algorithm
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: Strong 2048 bits block-cipher Algorithm
  • From: aerr0
• Re: Strong 2048 bits block-cipher Algorithm
  • From: SG
• Re: Strong 2048 bits block-cipher Algorithm
  • From: aerr0
• Re: Strong 2048 bits block-cipher Algorithm
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: how to encrypt the 10-digit values into encrypted 10-digit values?
  • From: pslind69
• Strong 2048 bits block-cipher Algorithm
  • From: aerr0
• Re: AES product
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: AES product
  • From: xolo
• Re: Decrypting ODS file, strange symptom
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Decrypting ODS file, strange symptom
  • From: Vaughn T
• Re: Strengthening stream encryption processing
  • From: amzoti
• Re: The classical sliding alphabets
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• The classical sliding alphabets
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: AES product
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Newton-Raphson division vs. Montgomery reduction
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Newton-Raphson division vs. Montgomery reduction
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Newton-Raphson division vs. Montgomery reduction
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: Newton-Raphson division vs. Montgomery reduction
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Newton-Raphson division vs. Montgomery reduction
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Newton-Raphson division vs. Montgomery reduction
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Newton-Raphson division vs. Montgomery reduction
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: Newton-Raphson division vs. Montgomery reduction
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Newton-Raphson division vs. Montgomery reduction
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Newton-Raphson division vs. Montgomery reduction
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Newton-Raphson division vs. Montgomery reduction
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: Newton-Raphson division vs. Montgomery reduction
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: Newton-Raphson division vs. Montgomery reduction
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Newton-Raphson division vs. Montgomery reduction
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Newton-Raphson division vs. Montgomery reduction
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: AES product
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Strengthening stream encryption processing
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Hash of a Map
  • From: Ilmari Karonen
• Re: AES product
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Miller-Rabin and false negatives
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Miller-Rabin and false negatives
  • From: yawnmoth
• pmk@hrpd.3gpp2
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: AES product
  • From: Blind Anagram
• Re: A link with news on P vs NP
  • From: William Ahern
• Re: AES product
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Hash of a Map
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: A link with news on P vs NP
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: portably printing a size_t
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Slightly OT - "widening" a hash
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: A link with news on P vs NP
  • From: rossum
• Great underwater, models, trips photogallery
  • From: zinedine
• Re: AES product
  • From: Blind Anagram
• portably printing a size_t
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: A link with news on P vs NP
  • From: Unruh
• Re: A link with news on P vs NP
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: A link with news on P vs NP
  • From: Unruh
• A link with news on P vs NP
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: AES product
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: AES product
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Need for speedy cryptography
  • From: amzoti
• Re: AES product
  • From: amzoti
• Re: AES product
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: AES product
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• "daily express urdu" "urdu newspapers of pakistan" "daily express pakistan" "family magzine" "magzine" "magzines" on www.pak-web-pages.blogspot.com
  • From: saima81
• Re: AES product
  • From: incog
• Q: AES product
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Slightly OT - "widening" a hash
  • From: Thomas ***in
• daily express urdu" "urdu newspapers of pakistan" "daily express pakistan" "family magzine" "magzine" "magzines" on www.pak-web-pages.blogspot.com
  • From: Naeem
• Re: Looking for encryption algorithm
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Looking for encryption algorithm
  • From: rossum
• Re: Looking for encryption algorithm
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Looking for encryption algorithm
  • From: qman qman
• Re: Looking for encryption algorithm
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Looking for encryption algorithm
  • From: mike clark
• Re: Looking for encryption algorithm
  • From: qman qman
• Re: Looking for encryption algorithm
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Looking for encryption algorithm
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Slightly OT - "widening" a hash
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Looking for encryption algorithm
  • From: qman qman
• Re: Sliding Window
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Looking for encryption algorithm
  • From: rossum
• Sliding Window
  • From: Martin
• Re: Looking for encryption algorithm
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Looking for encryption algorithm
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: Need for speedy cryptography
  • From: Nelson Bolyard
• Re: Slightly OT - "widening" a hash
  • From: Thomas ***in
• Slightly OT - "widening" a hash
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Robert Scott
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: RSA key "short ID"
  • From: Jean-Marc Desperrier
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Robert Scott
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Need for speedy cryptography
  • From: CatId
• Re: Need for speedy cryptography
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Need for speedy cryptography
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: Need for speedy cryptography
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Need for speedy cryptography
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Need for speedy cryptography
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Need for speedy cryptography
  • From: Le Chaud Lapin
• Re: Need for speedy cryptography
  • From: Robert Scott
• Need for speedy cryptography
  • From: Rob Blank
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Robert Scott
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Maaartin
• stage international
  • From: maléki TOUMOYE
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: rossum
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: RSA key "short ID"
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: CatId
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Robert Scott
• Re: RSA key "short ID"
  • From: Fabrice
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Robert Scott
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Unruh
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Fabrice
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Robert Scott
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Robert Scott
• Re: RSA key "short ID"
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Robert Scott
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Robert Scott
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Fabrice
• RSA key "short ID"
  • From: Fabrice
• Rendering prediction of congruential random number generators hard
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: mike clark
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: mike clark
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Unruh
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Robert Scott
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Robert Scott
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: One-way license number
  • From: David Eather
• One-way license number
  • From: Robert Scott
• *** Barcelona 09/10 home(A.Iniesta #8),***Barcelona Soccer Jersey
  • From: Nathaniel lee
• *** Real madrid 09/10 home Benzema #19 soccer jersey,***Real Madrid Soccer Jersey
  • From: Nathaniel lee
• *** Portugal 08/09 home soccer jersey,***Portugal Soccer Jersey
  • From: Nathaniel lee
• *** Denmark 08/09 home soccer jersey,***Denmark Soccer Jersey
  • From: Nathaniel lee
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Ilmari Karonen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: complexity and public-key cryptography
  • From: Unruh
• Re: complexity and public-key cryptography
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Music as crypto medium
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: questions about X.509's ASN.1 description
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• Re: questions about X.509's ASN.1 description
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• Re: questions about X.509's ASN.1 description
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• questions about X.509's ASN.1 description
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Unruh
• Daria Gunchenko Story: Det. Randy Cowan 1195, Hugh Ford Case
  • From: noauth
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: X.509's OIDs
  • From: yawnmoth
• X.509's OIDs
  • From: yawnmoth
• complexity and public-key cryptography
  • From: cplxphil
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Mnemonics
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Mnemonics
  • From: Unruh
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Mnemonics
  • From: rossum
• Re: Mnemonics
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• ~~~~~ MOEN FAUCETS ~~~~~
  • From: Ira Egan
• Re: Mnemonics
  • From: rossum
• Mnemonics
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Ilmari Karonen
• Re: Steganography via most frequently used words
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: PRNG using two functions
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Steganography via most frequently used words
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Steganography via most frequently used words
  • From: Dave -Turner
• Steganography via most frequently used words
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Cryptography Researchers: Access to over 10,000 researchers from 95 countries and advanced research tools
  • From: Dave -Turner
• Re: Cryptography Researchers: Access to over 10,000 researchers from 95 countries and advanced research tools
  • From: Phil O. Sopher
• Cryptography Researchers: Access to over 10,000 researchers from 95 countries and advanced research tools
  • From: Arin280
• Re: Q: SAC
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Nonlinear block chaining
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Q: SAC
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Nonlinear block chaining
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Nonlinear block chaining
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Q: SAC
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Nonlinear block chaining
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Q: SAC
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Q: SAC
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Q: SAC
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Authenticating variables size payloads with RSA
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Is it secure to use a CRC or a MAC as a cipher IV?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Q: SAC
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Avalanche measure
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: About padding with files in AES
  • From: Calvin Ramsey
• Re: About padding with files in AES
  • From: Blind Anagram
• Re: Authenticating variables size payloads with RSA
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Nonlinear block chaining
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Digram substitution using a polyalphabetic substitution table
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Authenticating variables size payloads with RSA
  • From: Fabrice
• Re: Is it secure to use a CRC or a MAC as a cipher IV?
  • From: Adam Ierymenko
• Re: Is it secure to use a CRC or a MAC as a cipher IV?
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Is it secure to use a CRC or a MAC as a cipher IV?
  • From: Adam Ierymenko
• Polyalphabetic substitution using two tables
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Is it secure to use a CRC or a MAC as a cipher IV?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Announcing: First-ever on-line collection of declassified Chaocipher-related correspondences
  • From: mosherubin
• Is it secure to use a CRC or a MAC as a cipher IV?
  • From: Adam Ierymenko
• Photogallery Models, trips and underwater
  • From: whiteshark
• Re: Avalanche measure
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Q: SAC
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Q: SAC
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: Q: SAC
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Q: SAC
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: Q: SAC
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: how to encrypt the 10-digit values into encrypted 10-digit values?
  • From: Paulo Marques
• Re: Q: SAC
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Q: SAC
  • From: Mok-Kong Shen
• Re: Authenticating variables size payloads with RSA
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Authenticating variables size payloads with RSA
  • From: Fabrice
• Re: Good sboxes
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Q: SAC
  • From: Maaartin
• Re: Q: SAC
  • From: Maaartin

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• News
• Mailing-Lists
• Newsgroups
• Service
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

www.derkeiler.com  > Newsgroups  > sci.crypt  > 2009-10