Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 27, 12:55 am, "Dave -Turner" <ad...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
pubkeybreaker why can you not keep the conversation civil? Surely if your
knowledge of everything you're hitting Tom with is correct then those facts
will speak for themselves without you having to resort to childish things
like name-calling.
You may be unaware of Tom's history in this NG. He was absent for a
long time.
He has said many highly insulting things, including some gross insults
aimed
at highly respected people, i.e. Dan Bernstein.
I have zero respect for him.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: Dave -Turner
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- References:
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: Greg Rose
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: pubkeybreaker
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: pubkeybreaker
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: pubkeybreaker
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: pubkeybreaker
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: Dave -Turner
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- Prev by Date: Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- Next by Date: Re: ECC in Botan?
- Previous by thread: Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- Next by thread: Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- Index(es):