Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: Tom St Denis <tom@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 26, 2:23 pm, pubkeybreaker <pubkeybrea...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
You truly are retarded.
Hey you know what. I was trying to be diplomatic in my conversation
with you. But alas, that's apparently not working. At every chance
where I tried to remain scientific and objective with you you've
thrown it back in my face [calling me naive, inexperienced, a child,
etc.]. Fine.
Let's call it a day, and in the future don't reply to my posts unless
you can check your ego. I really am trying to avoid being baited into
unproductive conversations.
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: pubkeybreaker
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- References:
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: Greg Rose
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: pubkeybreaker
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: pubkeybreaker
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- From: pubkeybreaker
- Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- Prev by Date: Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- Next by Date: Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- Previous by thread: Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- Next by thread: Re: google + bit of time == ecc curve that is better
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|