Re: RSASSA-PSS using a wounded hash function
- From: Noob <root@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:44:08 +0200
Tom St Denis wrote:
Noob wrote:
I'm using LTC to add RSASSA-PSS from to a slow (130 MHz) STB.
(Thanks for LTC ;-)
You're welcome, keep in mind there are no maintainers of LTC that I'm
aware of. A few people have offered up to maintain it over the years
but I have yet to see a 1.18 release ... :-/
There are bugs in some of the ASN.1 [which is largely incomplete] and
a few other places which I won't really go into.
I used rsa_export and rsa_import. AFAIU, these functions rely on the ASN.1 code.
Are there bugs in that specific part of the ASN.1 implementation, or was that
use case (rsa_import and rsa_export) somewhat bug-free?
The signature will only be as strong as it's weakest link, assuming
that's not your PK implementation it'll be the choice of hash.
What is considered the PK implementation?
Regards.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RSASSA-PSS using a wounded hash function
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: RSASSA-PSS using a wounded hash function
- References:
- RSASSA-PSS using a wounded hash function
- From: Noob
- Re: RSASSA-PSS using a wounded hash function
- From: Tom St Denis
- RSASSA-PSS using a wounded hash function
- Prev by Date: Luxury Gucci 107 G-Charms Mother of Pearl Flower Ladies Watch YA107511
- Next by Date: Re: Security of NTFS encrypted file system
- Previous by thread: Re: RSASSA-PSS using a wounded hash function
- Next by thread: Re: RSASSA-PSS using a wounded hash function
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
