Re: Optimized S-Boxes in Software
- From: Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jul 2009 08:11:12 -0700
Tom St Denis <tom@xxxxxxx> writes:
Even if you were using SSE and doing 128 substitutions in parallel
(block size of 128x8=1024 bits say) you'd still have probably
100-200 SSE operations per substitution. It'd really not come out ahead.
Maybe it will get more interesting with Larrabee, which will have 32
vector registers of 512 bits each, if I understand it right.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Optimized S-Boxes in Software
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: Optimized S-Boxes in Software
- References:
- Optimized S-Boxes in Software
- From: MTGAP
- Re: Optimized S-Boxes in Software
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: Optimized S-Boxes in Software
- From: MTGAP
- Re: Optimized S-Boxes in Software
- From: Tom St Denis
- Optimized S-Boxes in Software
- Prev by Date: Re: Optimized S-Boxes in Software
- Next by Date: Re: SHA-3 competition enters next round
- Previous by thread: Re: Optimized S-Boxes in Software
- Next by thread: Re: Optimized S-Boxes in Software
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|