Re: The Randomness Saga.



On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 21:47:52 -0700 (PDT), WTShaw <lurens1@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Jul 16, 9:25 am, rossum <rossu...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 05:51:11 -0700 (PDT), Paul Gittins

<pauly_25v...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip]

Enjoy - adacrypt

If you are posting as a sock puppet - "Paul Gittins" - then it does
not make much sense to sign with your usual nym as opposed to the sock
puppet you are using.

Attention to detail is required for any good cryptographic work, and
errors like this show that attention to detail is not your strong
suit.  This will count against you when you[sic] cryptographic contribution
is evaluated.

rossum

You forgot an R.
No. I forgot an "r", not an "R". Thanks for the correction anyway.

rossum

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Randomness Saga.
    ... not make much sense to sign with your usual nym as opposed to the sock ... puppet you are using. ... Attention to detail is required for any good cryptographic work, ... errors like this show that attention to detail is not your strong ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: The Randomness Saga.
    ... not make much sense to sign with your usual nym as opposed to the sock ... puppet you are using. ... Attention to detail is required for any good cryptographic work, ... errors like this show that attention to detail is not your strong ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: The Randomness Saga.
    ... not make much sense to sign with your usual nym as opposed to the sock ... puppet you are using. ... Attention to detail is required for any good cryptographic work, ... errors like this show that attention to detail is not your strong ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: The Randomness Saga.
    ... not make much sense to sign with your usual nym as opposed to the sock ... puppet you are using. ... Attention to detail is required for any good cryptographic work, ... errors like this show that attention to detail is not your strong ...
    (sci.crypt)