Re: Breaking LFSR.

On May 27, 5:47 am, WTShaw <lure...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

That's just the problem when working with a weak base. The answer to
make something much better is in using a selected higher base, a
longer serial key, and a deranged character set.

Your fun project since it is sos easy is to review the above as
encrypted in the following stream and tell us all about it.

%dmDc HZbX+ +4=t+ Y,bzs -mFi* W'p5# x£CHC av5jU (*F-Y I-9ZE G5iN2
c4%3O 4dFpa $eZ*p 39+Sy Qr$ZY '£ugn h&*E7 OV&wy 6f¢-£ 76ivK Ej-5a ?
4FFb #6!c; r5:VU P6Ktz *uRGV &;'wE )*#r( f6Tuw xr¢O) 7wS%z- Hide quoted text -

Could you rewrite the above in English? The first paragraph seems to
make sense (bad designs stay bad no matter what you do if the
principal design is weak in the first place) but everything that
follows make no sense at all to me.
.

Quantcast