Breaking LFSR.
- From: earlcolby.pottinger@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 13:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
Hello,
I have always been interested in using Logical Feedback Shift
Registers appoaches in my own 'Personal' code to encrypt stuff on my
own computer. Both hardware and software versions are easy to develop
and debug.
However, I always see messages that say LFSR are not secure.
Thinking about the problem I have been able to figure out how you
break a system that does one or more shifts between each encoded byte,
but I have found that my model of cracking the LFSR does not work if
you do more shifts than there are stages in LFSR itself.
Of-course for a small number of stages (n<64?) you can just try brute-
force attacks, but as N gets bigger you need to start pruning your
searches.
Any pointers or URLs would be welcome.
Earl Colby Pottinger (programming fool, and I do mean
fool.)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Breaking LFSR.
- From: David Eather
- Re: Breaking LFSR.
- Prev by Date: Re: why do X.509 certificates contain context-specific tags?
- Next by Date: Re: Breaking LFSR.
- Previous by thread: why do X.509 certificates contain context-specific tags?
- Next by thread: Re: Breaking LFSR.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading