Re: Comments on interface?
- From: rossum <rossum48@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:50:02 +0100
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:55:46 +0300, Phil Carmody
<thefatphil_demunged@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
rossum <rossum48@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:But we do use the block cypher primitive in only one direction to both
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:23:47 +0100, Mark Wooding
<mdw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If there is no inverse then it's not a block cipher.A block cypher in CTR mode ...
Yebbut, that's a stream mode. You're not using the
block cypher primitive to encode the plaintext.
encrypt and decrypt. Whether it is a "stream cypher" or a "block
cypher" in a specific mode ... :)
rossum
Phil
.
- References:
- Comments on interface?
- From: Jonathan Lee
- Re: Comments on interface?
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Comments on interface?
- From: Mark Wooding
- Re: Comments on interface?
- From: rossum
- Re: Comments on interface?
- From: Phil Carmody
- Comments on interface?
- Prev by Date: Re: Comments on interface?
- Next by Date: Tripwire!
- Previous by thread: Re: Comments on interface?
- Next by thread: Re: Comments on interface?
- Index(es):