Re: Prng Alvo
- From: rossum <rossum48@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:27:27 +0100
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 07:32:44 -0700 (PDT), Phoenix
<ribeiroalvo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 18 Abr, 13:26, rossum <rossu...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Probably not worth the effort. If pubkeybreaker says that your
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:51:08 -0700 (PDT), Phoenix
<ribeiroa...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 18 Abr, 10:17, rossum <rossu...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
rossum
What you think about the funtion I introduce to correct the problems
whit the bad seeds?
Alvo
algorithm has a problem with "VERY strong serial auto-
correlation", then you can accept that what he says is true.
You can read about autocorrelation here:
http://www.cacr.math.uwaterloo.ca/hac/about/chap5.pdf
in section 5.4.4 (v)
In order to correct a problem with bad seeds then you need to show
that you have eliminated *all* bad seeds, not just those that I found
in a few minutes of looking and thinking. To do that you will need a
good mathematical understanding of your algorithm. Start by looking
at the autocorrelation problem that pubkeybreaker has pointed out.
Work out why it is happening and then find a way to modify your
algorithm to eliminate the problem.
Even if the algorithm is not fixable (which I suspect is the case)
then you will have learned something new.
rossum
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Prng Alvo
- From: Phoenix
- Re: Prng Alvo
- References:
- Re: Prng Alvo
- From: rossum
- Re: Prng Alvo
- From: Phoenix
- Re: Prng Alvo
- From: rossum
- Re: Prng Alvo
- From: Phoenix
- Re: Prng Alvo
- From: rossum
- Re: Prng Alvo
- From: Phoenix
- Re: Prng Alvo
- From: rossum
- Re: Prng Alvo
- From: Phoenix
- Re: Prng Alvo
- Prev by Date: Re: Prng Alvo
- Next by Date: Re: Prng Alvo
- Previous by thread: Re: Prng Alvo
- Next by thread: Re: Prng Alvo
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading