Re: Prng Alvo
- From: rossum <rossum48@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:02:42 +0100
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:26:47 -0700 (PDT), pubkeybreaker
<pubkeybreaker@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 17, 2:13?pm, rossum <rossu...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Thank you for that Bob. I assumed that there was more wrong with it
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:38:36 -0700 (PDT), Phoenix
<ribeiroa...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 17 Abr, 15:42, pubkeybreaker <pubkeybrea...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 16, 8:39?pm, Phoenix <ribeiroa...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Guys, I want to know your opinion about this algorithm
Xn +1 = (SXn) - INT (SXn)
Seehttp://www.number.com.pt/index.html
It is hopeless. ?And your claim that it is not periodic is false.
Why do you say that it is hopeless and periodic?
Because it is.
Can you prove it?
Alvo
Yes he can. ?He knows what he is talking about.
It also has another problem. VERY strong serial auto-
correlation. I doubt the OP even knows what that is.//
You showed some of this with your example "bad seeds".
The SAC makes it unfit for even Monte-Carlo applications.
that I could find with a short look. If a simple mechanism like that
was any good then someone would probably already have published it.
rossum
.
- References:
- Prng Alvo
- From: Phoenix
- Re: Prng Alvo
- From: pubkeybreaker
- Re: Prng Alvo
- From: Phoenix
- Re: Prng Alvo
- From: rossum
- Re: Prng Alvo
- From: pubkeybreaker
- Prng Alvo
- Prev by Date: Re: simple math question
- Next by Date: Re: Prng Alvo
- Previous by thread: Re: Prng Alvo
- Next by thread: Research Talents ...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|