Re: Pell’s Equation

On Mar 13, 4:25 am, austin.oby...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
.

The writer admits to not knowing sufficient about Pell’s equation but
at the same time being very interested in the prospect of a solution
to the so-called factoring problem.  It behoves me to put my cards on

I've mathematically proven a solution to the factoring problem through
use of Pell's Equation.

The algebraic proof is easy to the point of trivial.

However, several posters and groups of posters have set themselves
against mathematical proof and turned to social tactics, including
false statements.

They put the world at risk. It remains to be seen what will occur as
a result of them gambling with the fate and security of nations.

<deleted>

Only a fool would try to discuss this very important project without
first of all getting his head around a full understanding of the
subject and this writer just hasn’t the time to do this at present i.e
to go deeply into into Legrange mathematics.  Pell’s equation must
surely be well known in pure mathematics and is bound to be backed up
with proven theorems within mathematics so the writer is not going to
challenge any of the claims made by the recent poster.  It does seem
to be too good to be true however and the writer is excited at the
prospect of it being demonstrated.

Pell's Equation IS famous in the literature, so the crime against
mathematics here is more egregious and also more fascinating as to how
it's possible.

My take on it is simple: many people in the mathematical and
cryptographic communities don't believe in mathematical proof!

OR if they believe in it, they also believe that lying is possible to
convince people who don't or who don't know enough mathematics to
understand that lying.

Regardless it's exciting to have the proof in hand, which does relate
Pell's Equation to factoring by showing you can factor a target
composite D with 100% certainty, by factoring instead D-1 and D+1.

Which is kind of an interesting thing in and of itself: the
mathematics allows an alternate route to factoring D by going after
D-1 and D+1, the two numbers around it.

No human being who truly valued mathematics could fail to appreciate
such a beautiful result.

Ergo, the people who are fighting this result, do not truly value
mathematics.

So later, when the world realizes that, if they are being paid as if
they do, then naturally that remuneration should cease.

It is only logical.


James Harris
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: Step by step through the factoring algorithm
    ... It's one reason I'm less enthralled with the factoring research as I ... Yeah, I knew he had to be wrong, from the mathematical proof. ... It's why people who value mathematics say that proof is more important ... To the math, it's not about factoring D, as the math doesn't care. ...
    (sci.math)
  • =?windows-1252?Q?Pell=92s_Equation?=
    ... subject and this writer just hasn’t the time to do this at present i.e ... to go deeply into into Legrange mathematics. ... prospect of it being demonstrated. ... integers during the factoring process. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • =?windows-1252?Q?Re=3A_Pell=92s_Equation?=
    ... subject and this writer just hasn’t the time to do this at present i.e ... to go deeply into into Legrange mathematics. ... prospect of it being demonstrated. ... integers during the factoring process. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Theory versus implemention, Im puzzled
    ... > But I have the full mathematical theory. ... > theory is worked out to a solution to the factoring problem. ... > that mathematical proof is what's important. ... > claim to disdain demonstration or even practical uses to mathematics. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Theory versus implemention, Im puzzled
    ... > But I have the full mathematical theory. ... > theory is worked out to a solution to the factoring problem. ... > that mathematical proof is what's important. ... > claim to disdain demonstration or even practical uses to mathematics. ...
    (sci.math)