sci.crypt

• Date Index

---

• signature of X509 certificates, jogerhard
  • Re: signature of X509 certificates, Bruce Stephens
    • Re: signature of X509 certificates, jogerhard
      • Re: signature of X509 certificates, Bruce Stephens
  • Re: signature of X509 certificates, Bryan Olson
• Coming soon: Full-disk encryption for all computer drives, John Hadstate
  • Re: Coming soon: Full-disk encryption for all computer drives, Björn Edström
• Ubuntu 8.10 filesystem encryption @ install, dgetsman
  • Re: Ubuntu 8.10 filesystem encryption @ install, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Ubuntu 8.10 filesystem encryption @ install, dgetsman
      • Re: Ubuntu 8.10 filesystem encryption @ install, 1PW
      • Re: Ubuntu 8.10 filesystem encryption @ install, dgetsman
      • Re: Ubuntu 8.10 filesystem encryption @ install, 1PW
• Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one, Dave -Turner
  • Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one, Unruh
    • Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one, WTShaw
      • Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one, Unruh
      • Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one, Mark Wooding
      • Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one, WTShaw
  • Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one, Guy Macon
  • Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one, Thomas ***in
    • Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one, WTShaw
  • Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one, Bryan Olson
• The Simplest Overview of Recent Crypto System Claims., austin . obyrne
  • Re: The Simplest Overview of Recent Crypto System Claims., Bruce Stephens
    • Re: The Simplest Overview of Recent Crypto System Claims., Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: The Simplest Overview of Recent Crypto System Claims., WTShaw
      • Re: The Simplest Overview of Recent Crypto System Claims., Maaartin
      • Re: The Simplest Overview of Recent Crypto System Claims., WTShaw
      • Re: The Simplest Overview of Recent Crypto System Claims., Maaartin
• On-Disk Encryption and Data Integrity, Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: On-Disk Encryption and Data Integrity, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: On-Disk Encryption and Data Integrity, Jeffrey Walton
      • Re: On-Disk Encryption and Data Integrity, Mark Wooding
      • Re: On-Disk Encryption and Data Integrity, jeffrey . w . walton
      • Re: On-Disk Encryption and Data Integrity, Mark Wooding
• Performance of RSA key generation, Giuliano Bertoletti
  • Re: Performance of RSA key generation, Mark Wooding
    • Re: Performance of RSA key generation, Ertugrul Söylemez
      • Re: Performance of RSA key generation, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Performance of RSA key generation, Ertugrul Söylemez
      • Re: Performance of RSA key generation, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Performance of RSA key generation, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Performance of RSA key generation, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: Performance of RSA key generation, Peter Gutmann
      • Re: Performance of RSA key generation, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Performance of RSA key generation, Mark Wooding
      • Re: Performance of RSA key generation, Ertugrul Söylemez
      • Re: Performance of RSA key generation, Mark Wooding
      • Re: Performance of RSA key generation, Ertugrul Söylemez
  • Message not available
    • Re: Performance of RSA key generation, Giuliano Bertoletti
• Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption, Björn Edström
  • Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption, Björn Edström
      • Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption, Simon Johnson
      • Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption, Björn Edström
      • Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption, Björn Edström
      • Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption, Björn Edström
      • Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption, Simon Johnson
      • Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption, Björn Edström
      • Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption, Mark Wooding
• Just Think About It., austin . obyrne
  • Re: Just Think About It., Bruce Stephens
  • Re: Just Think About It., Gordon Burditt
• Obama's Blackberry, WTShaw
  • Re: Obama's Blackberry, Basil Brush
  • Re: Obama's Blackberry, Boon
    • Re: Obama's Blackberry, WTShaw
• Re: PGP vs. S/MIME in USENET (was: Re: Are ++ and -- operators reallymore efficient), CBFalconer
  • Re: PGP vs. S/MIME in USENET, Stephen Sprunk
• Encryption modes, Maaartin
• Re: Still an Erratum in NIST SP800-67 v1.1?, Francois Grieu
• Re: JSH: Factoring with Pell's Equation, Scott Contini
  • Re: JSH: Factoring with Pell's Equation, JSH
    • Re: JSH: Factoring with Pell's Equation, Scott Contini
      • Re: JSH: Factoring with Pell's Equation, Simon Johnson
• Microsoft ‘Excel’ Software Ideal in Vector Driven Hash Methodology., austin . obyrne
  • Message not available
    • Re: Microsoft ‘Excel’ Software Ideal in Vector Driven Hash Methodology., austin . obyrne
• Rado Ceramica Watch, Best Wristwatch, bagsbags55
• Jaeger LeCoultre Grande Reverse Watch, Best Wristwatch, bagsbags55
• Technomarine TMY Watch, Best Wristwatch, bagsbags55
• Seiko Hard to Find Seiko Watch, Best Wristwatch, bagsbags55
• Girard Perregaux Cat's Eye Watch, Best Wristwatch, bagsbags55
• Baume & Mercier Linea Watch, Best Wristwatch, bagsbags55
• Girard Perregaux Classic Elegance Watch, Best Wristwatch, bagsbags55
• My own e-mail encryption solution, Anonymous
  • Re: My own e-mail encryption solution, bert
  • Re: My own e-mail encryption solution, Dave -Turner
  • Re: My own e-mail encryption solution, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: My own e-mail encryption solution, WTShaw
    • Re: My own e-mail encryption solution, Boon
      • Re: My own e-mail encryption solution, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: My own e-mail encryption solution, Mark Wooding
      • Re: My own e-mail encryption solution, Phil Carmody
      • Re: My own e-mail encryption solution, Mark Wooding
      • Re: My own e-mail encryption solution, Boon
      • Re: My own e-mail encryption solution, Phil Carmody
• How long can we wait before we absolutely must take steps to protect against quantum computer attacks?, Benjamin Gittins
  • Re: How long can we wait before we absolutely must take steps to protect against quantum computer attacks?, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: How long can we wait before we absolutely must take steps to protect against quantum computer attacks?, Mark Wooding
  • Re: How long can we wait before we absolutely must take steps to protect against quantum computer attacks?, heinen . r
• Multiple layers of encryption, Basil Brush
  • Re: Multiple layers of encryption, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Multiple layers of encryption, David Wagner
  • Re: Multiple layers of encryption, Guy Macon
  • Re: Multiple layers of encryption, rossum
  • Re: Multiple layers of encryption, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: Multiple layers of encryption, rossum
      • Re: Multiple layers of encryption, Guy Macon
      • Re: Multiple layers of encryption, rossum
    • Re: Multiple layers of encryption, Mark Wooding
      • Re: Multiple layers of encryption, Basil Brush
      • Re: Multiple layers of encryption, David Wagner
      • Re: Multiple layers of encryption, Basil Brush
• Wntd: "Station X" vhs video box set, sparks
• Announcing "Academia.edu" to the Cryptology community, Richard Price
  • Re: Announcing "Academia.edu" to the Cryptology community, Paul Rubin
    • Re: Announcing "Academia.edu" to the Cryptology community, Chris McDonald
      • Re: Announcing "Academia.edu" to the Cryptology community, Ilmari Karonen
• SHA-256 & collisions, howa
  • Re: SHA-256 & collisions, rossum
    • Re: SHA-256 & collisions, Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: SHA-256 & collisions, Mark Wooding
  • Re: SHA-256 & collisions, Thomas ***in
    • Re: SHA-256 & collisions, howa
      • Re: SHA-256 & collisions, Ilmari Karonen
      • Re: SHA-256 & collisions, Phil Carmody
    • Re: SHA-256 & collisions, Boon
      • Re: SHA-256 & collisions, David Eather
      • Re: SHA-256 & collisions, Boon
      • Re: SHA-256 & collisions, Thomas ***in
  • Re: SHA-256 & collisions, Andrew Swallow
• A method for differential cryptanalysis, Elias Yarrkov
  • Re: A method for differential cryptanalysis, David Wagner
    • Re: A method for differential cryptanalysis, Elias Yarrkov
      • Re: A method for differential cryptanalysis, David Wagner
      • Re: A method for differential cryptanalysis, Elias Yarrkov
      • Re: A method for differential cryptanalysis, Unruh
      • Re: A method for differential cryptanalysis, Elias Yarrkov
      • Re: A method for differential cryptanalysis, David Wagner
      • Re: A method for differential cryptanalysis, Elias Yarrkov
• The World Wide Credibility of Vector Cryptography., austin . obyrne
  • Re: The World Wide Credibility of Vector Cryptography., Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: The World Wide Credibility of Vector Cryptography., Maaartin
  • Re: The World Wide Credibility of Vector Cryptography., Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: The World Wide Credibility of Vector Cryptography., Gordon Burditt
  • Re: The World Wide Credibility of Vector Cryptography., earlcolby . pottinger
• hash of a string is the same string?, countableinfinity
  • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Ilmari Karonen
    • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, heinen . r
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Ilmari Karonen
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Ilmari Karonen
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Peter Pearson
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Scott Fluhrer
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Ilmari Karonen
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Peter Pearson
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Unruh
    • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, countableinfinity
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Unruh
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, rossum
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Unruh
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, rossum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, countableinfinity
    • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Ilmari Karonen
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Ertugrul Söylemez
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Unruh
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Ertugrul Söylemez
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Ilmari Karonen
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Guy Macon
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Paul Rubin
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Guy Macon
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, David Wagner
      • Re: hash of a string is the same string?, Ertugrul Söylemez
• TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise, Jo Schueth
  • Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise, Rob Warnock
    • Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise, rossum
    • Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise, David Eather
      • Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise, Jo Schueth
      • Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise, David Eather
      • Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise, Guy Macon
    • Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise, Jo Schueth
      • Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise, Paul Rubin
      • Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise, Jo Schueth
  • Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise, Peter Fairbrother
    • Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise, Jo Schueth
• Re: Rengasrauta, Juhana Jääskeläinen
• Re: Malmön terrori, Koponen
• PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers, robdevloper
  • Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers, Paul Rubin
  • Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers, Unruh
  • Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers, amzoti
    • Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers, Unruh
  • Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers, Simon Johnson
    • Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers, Unruh
      • Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers, robdevloper
      • Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers, David Wagner
      • Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers, Tim Smith
      • Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers, Unruh
• Recursive Encryption in the ASCII_Pad Cipher – Discussion Topic, austin . obyrne
  • Re: Recursive Encryption in the ASCII_Pad Cipher – Discussion Topic, rossum
• Non-expanding transform for designing nonmalleable encryption mode., Valery Pryamikov
  • Re: Non-expanding transform for designing nonmalleable encryption mode., Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Non-expanding transform for designing nonmalleable encryption mode., Valery Pryamikov
      • Re: Non-expanding transform for designing nonmalleable encryption mode., Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Non-expanding transform for designing nonmalleable encryption mode., Valery Pryamikov
  • Re: Non-expanding transform for designing nonmalleable encryption mode., Scott Fluhrer
    • Re: Non-expanding transform for designing nonmalleable encryption mode., Valery Pryamikov
  • Re: Non-expanding transform for designing nonmalleable encryption mode., biject
• Avalanche Testing., loki
  • Re: Avalanche Testing., Maaartin
• finding idx, declan8santa
• Why are Western ('democratic') countries censoring the Internet?, Anonymous
  • Re: Why are Western ('democratic') countries censoring the Internet?, WTShaw
• OTP and the proof thereof – Discussion Topic., austin . obyrne
  • Re: OTP and the proof thereof – Discussion Topic., austin . obyrne
    • Re: OTP_and_the_proof_thereof: Discussion_Topic, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: OTP_and_the_proof_thereof: Discussion_Topic, WTShaw
• Coach Signature Stripe Magazine Tote - Red Collection, hdjbas
• Re: Encyption of two 256-blocks, Maaartin
• Fast non-cryptographic hash, Maaartin
  • Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash, David Wagner
    • Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash, Maaartin
      • Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash, David Wagner
      • Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash, Maaartin
      • Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash, David Wagner
      • Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash, Paul Rubin
    • Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash, Mark Wooding
      • Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash, Rob Warnock
      • Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash, David Wagner
      • Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash, Rob Warnock
      • Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash, Thomas ***in
      • Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash, Mark Wooding
      • Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash, Maaartin
      • Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash, Peter Pearson
  • Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash, Robert Kochem
  • Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash, Peter Pearson
• Re: NSA Cray SuperComputer for Brute Force Encryption Cracking - Video, mathewm
• Re: SHA-3 Round 1 Candidates announced, William Ahern
  • Re: SHA-3 Round 1 Candidates announced, Guy Macon
• Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?), MisterE
  • Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?), dudajar
    • Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?), dudajar
      • Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?), Unruh
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?), earlcolby . pottinger
    • Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?), dudajar
      • Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?), Unruh
      • Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?), dudajar
      • Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?), Unruh
      • Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?), dudajar
      • Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?), dudajar
      • Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?), dudajar
• Workshop "Medical Imaging Systems" within EUROMEDIA 2009 – Announce & Call for Papers, tavares@xxxxxxxx
• Speed of hashing doesn't matter?, Paul Rubin
  • Re: Speed of hashing doesn't matter?, Mark Wooding
  • Re: Speed of hashing doesn't matter?, Unruh
  • Re: Speed of hashing doesn't matter?, Simon Johnson
    • Re: Speed of hashing doesn't matter?, Maaartin
    • Re: Speed of hashing doesn't matter?, Scott Contini
• Is this encryption method ok?, Paul Rubin
  • Re: Is this encryption method ok?, Paul Rubin
  • Re: Is this encryption method ok?, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Is this encryption method ok?, Mark Wooding
      • Re: Is this encryption method ok?, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Is this encryption method ok?, Mark Wooding
      • Re: Is this encryption method ok?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Is this encryption method ok?, Paul Rubin
  • Re: Is this encryption method ok?, Simon Johnson
    • Re: Is this encryption method ok?, Paul Rubin
  • Re: Is this encryption method ok?, David Wagner
• Re: fast arm9 cipher?, Phil Carmody
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: fast arm9 cipher?, Maaartin
• Re: Unicity Theory is Obsolete – Discussion Topic, WTShaw
  • Re: Unicity Theory is Obsolete – Discussion Topic, austin . obyrne
• Re: Random Number Help, Gordon Burditt
  • Re: Random Number Help, Maaartin
  • Re: Random Number Help, Unruh
    • Re: Random Number Help, Rob Warnock
      • Re: Random Number Help, Maaartin
      • Re: Random Number Help, Rob Warnock
    • Re: Random Number Help, Thomas ***in
      • Re: Random Number Help, Guy Macon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Random Number Help, Bryan Olson
• Re: universal constants in cryptography?, Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: universal constants in cryptography?, de_magnete
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: universal constants in cryptography?, pseudo

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• News
• Mailing-Lists
• Newsgroups
• Service
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

www.derkeiler.com  > Newsgroups  > sci.crypt  > 2009-01