Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Jan 2009 00:16:56 -0800
Ertugrul Söylemez <es@xxxxxxxx> writes:
The average implementation uses e = 65537.
I don't understand why they don't use e=3. Is it an artifact of the
era when proper padding and its effects on provable security wasn't
understood?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Joseph Ashwood
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- References:
- Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Giuliano Bertoletti
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Mark Wooding
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Ertugrul Söylemez
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Ertugrul Söylemez
- Performance of RSA key generation
- Prev by Date: Re: On-Disk Encryption and Data Integrity
- Next by Date: Re: On-Disk Encryption and Data Integrity
- Previous by thread: Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- Next by thread: Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|