sci.crypt
- Re: The Simplest Overview of Recent Crypto System Claims.
- From: Maaartin
- Re: The Simplest Overview of Recent Crypto System Claims.
- From: WTShaw
- Re: signature of X509 certificates
- From: Bruce Stephens
- Re: signature of X509 certificates
- From: jogerhard
- Re: signature of X509 certificates
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: signature of X509 certificates
- From: Bruce Stephens
- signature of X509 certificates
- From: jogerhard
- Re: Coming soon: Full-disk encryption for all computer drives
- From: Björn Edström
- Coming soon: Full-disk encryption for all computer drives
- From: John Hadstate
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Giuliano Bertoletti
- Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption
- From: Björn Edström
- Re: Ubuntu 8.10 filesystem encryption @ install
- From: dgetsman
- Re: The Simplest Overview of Recent Crypto System Claims.
- From: Maaartin
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Peter Gutmann
- Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption
- From: Simon Johnson
- Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one
- From: WTShaw
- Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one
- From: WTShaw
- Re: Ubuntu 8.10 filesystem encryption @ install
- From: 1PW
- Re: Ubuntu 8.10 filesystem encryption @ install
- From: 1PW
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Ertugrul Söylemez
- Re: Ubuntu 8.10 filesystem encryption @ install
- From: dgetsman
- Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption
- From: Mark Wooding
- Re: On-Disk Encryption and Data Integrity
- From: Mark Wooding
- Re: Ubuntu 8.10 filesystem encryption @ install
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one
- From: Mark Wooding
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Mark Wooding
- Ubuntu 8.10 filesystem encryption @ install
- From: dgetsman
- Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one
- From: Thomas Pornin
- Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one
- From: Unruh
- Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption
- From: Björn Edström
- Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: The Simplest Overview of Recent Crypto System Claims.
- From: WTShaw
- Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one
- From: WTShaw
- Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one
- From: Dave -Turner
- Re: Encrypting with two or more algorithms vs one
- From: Unruh
- Re: The Simplest Overview of Recent Crypto System Claims.
- From: Joseph Ashwood
- Re: On-Disk Encryption and Data Integrity
- From: jeffrey . w . walton
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Ertugrul Söylemez
- Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption
- From: Björn Edström
- Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption
- From: Björn Edström
- Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption
- From: Simon Johnson
- Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption
- From: Björn Edström
- Re: Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: The Simplest Overview of Recent Crypto System Claims.
- From: Bruce Stephens
- Re: On-Disk Encryption and Data Integrity
- From: Mark Wooding
- The Simplest Overview of Recent Crypto System Claims.
- From: austin . obyrne
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Mark Wooding
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Joseph Ashwood
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: On-Disk Encryption and Data Integrity
- From: Jeffrey Walton
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: On-Disk Encryption and Data Integrity
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Ertugrul Söylemez
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Ertugrul Söylemez
- Re: Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Mark Wooding
- On-Disk Encryption and Data Integrity
- From: Jeffrey Walton
- Performance of RSA key generation
- From: Giuliano Bertoletti
- Re: Obama's Blackberry
- From: WTShaw
- Requesting comments: SRP based IRC encryption
- From: Björn Edström
- Re: My own e-mail encryption solution
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: My own e-mail encryption solution
- From: Boon
- Re: Obama's Blackberry
- From: Boon
- Re: Just Think About It.
- From: Gordon Burditt
- Re: Obama's Blackberry
- From: Basil Brush
- Re: JSH: Factoring with Pell's Equation
- From: Simon Johnson
- Re: JSH: Factoring with Pell's Equation
- From: Scott Contini
- Re: Just Think About It.
- From: Bruce Stephens
- Just Think About It.
- From: austin . obyrne
- Re: JSH: Factoring with Pell's Equation
- From: JSH
- Obama's Blackberry
- From: WTShaw
- Re: PGP vs. S/MIME in USENET
- From: Stephen Sprunk
- Re: PGP vs. S/MIME in USENET (was: Re: Are ++ and -- operators reallymore efficient)
- From: CBFalconer
- Encryption modes
- From: Maaartin
- Re: Still an Erratum in NIST SP800-67 v1.1?
- From: Francois Grieu
- Re: JSH: Factoring with Pell's Equation
- From: Scott Contini
- Re: My own e-mail encryption solution
- From: Mark Wooding
- Re: My own e-mail encryption solution
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?)
- From: dudajar
- Re: Multiple layers of encryption
- From: Basil Brush
- Re: Microsoft ‘Excel’ Software Ideal in Vector Driven Hash Methodology.
- From: austin . obyrne
- Re: A method for differential cryptanalysis
- From: Elias Yarrkov
- Microsoft ‘Excel’ Software Ideal in Vector Driven Hash Methodology.
- From: austin . obyrne
- Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?)
- From: dudajar
- Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?)
- From: dudajar
- Re: My own e-mail encryption solution
- From: Mark Wooding
- Rado Ceramica Watch, Best Wristwatch
- From: bagsbags55
- Jaeger LeCoultre Grande Reverse Watch, Best Wristwatch
- From: bagsbags55
- Technomarine TMY Watch, Best Wristwatch
- From: bagsbags55
- Seiko Hard to Find Seiko Watch, Best Wristwatch
- From: bagsbags55
- Girard Perregaux Cat's Eye Watch, Best Wristwatch
- From: bagsbags55
- Baume & Mercier Linea Watch, Best Wristwatch
- From: bagsbags55
- Girard Perregaux Classic Elegance Watch, Best Wristwatch
- From: bagsbags55
- Re: My own e-mail encryption solution
- From: Joseph Ashwood
- Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?)
- From: Unruh
- Re: My own e-mail encryption solution
- From: Boon
- Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?)
- From: dudajar
- Re: Multiple layers of encryption
- From: David Wagner
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: rossum
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Unruh
- Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?)
- From: Unruh
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: rossum
- Re: Multiple layers of encryption
- From: Basil Brush
- Re: SHA-256 & collisions
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: How long can we wait before we absolutely must take steps to protect against quantum computer attacks?
- From: heinen . r
- Re: My own e-mail encryption solution
- From: WTShaw
- Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?)
- From: dudajar
- Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?)
- From: earlcolby . pottinger
- Re: My own e-mail encryption solution
- From: Joseph Ashwood
- Re: SHA-256 & collisions
- From: Thomas Pornin
- Re: How long can we wait before we absolutely must take steps to protect against quantum computer attacks?
- From: Mark Wooding
- Re: Multiple layers of encryption
- From: Mark Wooding
- Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?)
- From: Unruh
- Re: SHA-256 & collisions
- From: Boon
- Re: My own e-mail encryption solution
- From: Dave -Turner
- Re: SHA-256 & collisions
- From: David Eather
- Re: SHA-256 & collisions
- From: Boon
- Re: My own e-mail encryption solution
- From: bert
- Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?)
- From: dudajar
- My own e-mail encryption solution
- From: Anonymous
- Re: Multiple layers of encryption
- From: rossum
- Re: SHA-256 & collisions
- From: Ilmari Karonen
- Re: SHA-256 & collisions
- From: howa
- Re: Multiple layers of encryption
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: SHA-256 & collisions
- From: Andrew Swallow
- Re: Announcing "Academia.edu" to the Cryptology community
- From: Ilmari Karonen
- Re: Multiple layers of encryption
- From: rossum
- Re: How long can we wait before we absolutely must take steps to protect against quantum computer attacks?
- From: Joseph Ashwood
- How long can we wait before we absolutely must take steps to protect against quantum computer attacks?
- From: Benjamin Gittins
- Re: Multiple layers of encryption
- From: Joseph Ashwood
- Re: Multiple layers of encryption
- From: rossum
- Re: Multiple layers of encryption
- From: David Wagner
- Re: Multiple layers of encryption
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: Multiple layers of encryption
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Multiple layers of encryption
- From: Basil Brush
- Wntd: "Station X" vhs video box set
- From: sparks
- Re: Announcing "Academia.edu" to the Cryptology community
- From: Chris McDonald
- Re: Announcing "Academia.edu" to the Cryptology community
- From: Paul Rubin
- Announcing "Academia.edu" to the Cryptology community
- From: Richard Price
- Re: SHA-256 & collisions
- From: Thomas Pornin
- Re: SHA-256 & collisions
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: SHA-256 & collisions
- From: Mark Wooding
- Re: SHA-256 & collisions
- From: rossum
- SHA-256 & collisions
- From: howa
- Re: A method for differential cryptanalysis
- From: David Wagner
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Ertugrul Söylemez
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: A method for differential cryptanalysis
- From: Elias Yarrkov
- Re: A method for differential cryptanalysis
- From: Unruh
- Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise
- From: Jo Schueth
- Re: A method for differential cryptanalysis
- From: Elias Yarrkov
- Re: A method for differential cryptanalysis
- From: David Wagner
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: David Wagner
- Re: A method for differential cryptanalysis
- From: Elias Yarrkov
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Ilmari Karonen
- Re: The World Wide Credibility of Vector Cryptography.
- From: earlcolby . pottinger
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Ertugrul Söylemez
- Re: A method for differential cryptanalysis
- From: David Wagner
- A method for differential cryptanalysis
- From: Elias Yarrkov
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Unruh
- Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise
- From: David Eather
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Peter Pearson
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Ertugrul Söylemez
- Re: The World Wide Credibility of Vector Cryptography.
- From: Gordon Burditt
- Re: The World Wide Credibility of Vector Cryptography.
- From: Joseph Ashwood
- Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: The World Wide Credibility of Vector Cryptography.
- From: Maaartin
- Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise
- From: Jo Schueth
- Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise
- From: Jo Schueth
- Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise
- From: Jo Schueth
- Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise
- From: David Eather
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Unruh
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Unruh
- Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise
- From: Peter Fairbrother
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Ilmari Karonen
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Ilmari Karonen
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Scott Fluhrer
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Peter Pearson
- Re: The World Wide Credibility of Vector Cryptography.
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Ilmari Karonen
- The World Wide Credibility of Vector Cryptography.
- From: austin . obyrne
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: countableinfinity
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: countableinfinity
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Ilmari Karonen
- Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise
- From: rossum
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: heinen . r
- Re: hash of a string is the same string?
- From: Ilmari Karonen
- Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers
- From: Tim Smith
- hash of a string is the same string?
- From: countableinfinity
- Re: TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise
- From: Rob Warnock
- TRNG with 18 Mbit/s using Thermal Noise
- From: Jo Schueth
- Re: Rengasrauta
- From: Juhana Jääskeläinen
- Re: Malmön terrori
- From: Koponen
- Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers
- From: Unruh
- Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers
- From: David Wagner
- Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers
- From: robdevloper
- Re: Avalanche Testing.
- From: Maaartin
- Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers
- From: Unruh
- Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers
- From: Simon Johnson
- Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers
- From: Unruh
- Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers
- From: amzoti
- Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers
- From: Unruh
- Re: PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers
- From: Paul Rubin
- PhD in cryptography sufficient for research in quantum computers
- From: robdevloper
- Re: OTP_and_the_proof_thereof: Discussion_Topic
- From: WTShaw
- Re: Non-expanding transform for designing nonmalleable encryption mode.
- From: Valery Pryamikov
- Re: Non-expanding transform for designing nonmalleable encryption mode.
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: Non-expanding transform for designing nonmalleable encryption mode.
- From: biject
- Re: OTP_and_the_proof_thereof: Discussion_Topic
- From: Gordon Burditt
- Re: Non-expanding transform for designing nonmalleable encryption mode.
- From: Valery Pryamikov
- Re: Non-expanding transform for designing nonmalleable encryption mode.
- From: Scott Fluhrer
- Re: Recursive Encryption in the ASCII_Pad Cipher – Discussion Topic
- From: rossum
- Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: Peter Pearson
- Re: Non-expanding transform for designing nonmalleable encryption mode.
- From: Valery Pryamikov
- Re: Non-expanding transform for designing nonmalleable encryption mode.
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Recursive Encryption in the ASCII_Pad Cipher – Discussion Topic
- From: austin . obyrne
- Non-expanding transform for designing nonmalleable encryption mode.
- From: Valery Pryamikov
- Avalanche Testing.
- From: loki
- Re: universal constants in cryptography?
- From: pseudo
- finding idx
- From: declan8santa
- Re: Why are Western ('democratic') countries censoring the Internet?
- From: WTShaw
- Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: Maaartin
- Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: Mark Wooding
- Re: OTP and the proof thereof – Discussion Topic.
- From: austin . obyrne
- Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: Thomas Pornin
- Why are Western ('democratic') countries censoring the Internet?
- From: Anonymous
- Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: Rob Warnock
- Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: David Wagner
- Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: Rob Warnock
- Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: Mark Wooding
- Re: Is this encryption method ok?
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Random Number Help
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: Peter Pearson
- Re: Random Number Help
- From: Thomas Pornin
- OTP and the proof thereof – Discussion Topic.
- From: austin . obyrne
- Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: Robert Kochem
- Re: Random Number Help
- From: Rob Warnock
- Coach Signature Stripe Magazine Tote - Red Collection
- From: hdjbas
- Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: David Wagner
- Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: Maaartin
- Re: fast arm9 cipher?
- From: Maaartin
- Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: David Wagner
- Re: Encyption of two 256-blocks
- From: Maaartin
- Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: Maaartin
- Re: Speed of hashing doesn't matter?
- From: Scott Contini
- Re: Speed of hashing doesn't matter?
- From: Maaartin
- Re: Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: David Wagner
- Fast non-cryptographic hash
- From: Maaartin
- Re: Random Number Help
- From: Maaartin
- Re: Speed of hashing doesn't matter?
- From: Simon Johnson
- Re: NSA Cray SuperComputer for Brute Force Encryption Cracking - Video
- From: mathewm
- Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?)
- From: dudajar
- Re: Random Number Help
- From: Rob Warnock
- Re: SHA-3 Round 1 Candidates announced
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: Is this encryption method ok?
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: SHA-3 Round 1 Candidates announced
- From: William Ahern
- Re: New computation method which could endanger used cryptosystems (?)
- From: MisterE
- Re: Speed of hashing doesn't matter?
- From: Unruh
- Workshop "Medical Imaging Systems" within EUROMEDIA 2009 – Announce & Call for Papers
- From: tavares@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Speed of hashing doesn't matter?
- From: Mark Wooding
- Re: Is this encryption method ok?
- From: Mark Wooding
- Re: Is this encryption method ok?
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Is this encryption method ok?
- From: Mark Wooding
- Speed of hashing doesn't matter?
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Unicity Theory is Obsolete – Discussion Topic
- From: austin . obyrne
- Re: Is this encryption method ok?
- From: David Wagner
- Re: Is this encryption method ok?
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Is this encryption method ok?
- From: Simon Johnson
- Re: Is this encryption method ok?
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: Random Number Help
- From: Unruh
- Re: Random Number Help
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: Is this encryption method ok?
- From: Paul Rubin
- Is this encryption method ok?
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: fast arm9 cipher?
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Random Number Help
- From: Maaartin
- Re: universal constants in cryptography?
- From: de_magnete
- Re: Unicity Theory is Obsolete – Discussion Topic
- From: WTShaw
- Re: Random Number Help
- From: Gordon Burditt
- Re: universal constants in cryptography?
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen