Re: Breaking Large Composite Numbers...???

Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 12, 2:45 am, Kristian Gjøsteen <kristiag+n...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
user923005  <dcor...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
larger and larger bit sizes will be needed for cryptographic saftey in
the near future.

Conservative users have already moved to 2000 or 3000 bit RSA/dlog-based
keys, or 256-bit elliptic curve keys.

IMO, "conservative=ignorant" here.

I know. :-)

We are nowhere close to being able to do even 1024 bit RSA with
existing algorithms.

--
Kristian Gjøsteen
.

Quantcast