Re: Breaking Large Composite Numbers...???

On Dec 12, 2:45 am, Kristian Gjøsteen <kristiag+n...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
user923005  <dcor...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
larger and larger bit sizes will be needed for cryptographic saftey in
the near future.

Conservative users have already moved to 2000 or 3000 bit RSA/dlog-based
keys, or 256-bit elliptic curve keys.

IMO, "conservative=ignorant" here.

We are nowhere close to being able to do even 1024 bit RSA with
existing algorithms.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Breaking Large Composite Numbers...???
    ... Pubkeybreaker wrote: ... Conservative users have already moved to 2000 or 3000 bit RSA/dlog-based ... or 256-bit elliptic curve keys. ... IMO, "conservative=ignorant" here. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Breaking Large Composite Numbers...???
    ... or 256-bit elliptic curve keys. ... existing algorithms. ... up a new attack approach, ... You don't want to change your encryption protocols AFTER you discover ...
    (sci.crypt)
Loading