Re: Signatures and encryption headers
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen <kristiag+news@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 07:45:35 +0000 (UTC)
Fabrice <fabrice.gautier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But why? It seems that many application do it the other way around.
You can do it either way, but encrypting first, then mac'ing is
significantly easier to get right.
The easiest is of course to use a cryptographic mode with support for
integrity and clear-text headers. Those are quite easy to get right...
--
Kristian Gjøsteen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Signatures and encryption headers
- From: Fabrice
- Re: Signatures and encryption headers
- References:
- Signatures and encryption headers
- From: Fabrice
- Re: Signatures and encryption headers
- From: Fabrice
- Re: Signatures and encryption headers
- From: John E. Hadstate
- Re: Signatures and encryption headers
- From: Fabrice
- Signatures and encryption headers
- Prev by Date: Re: filter-type encryption program for Unix
- Next by Date: Re: Signatures and encryption headers
- Previous by thread: Re: Signatures and encryption headers
- Next by thread: Re: Signatures and encryption headers
- Index(es):