Re: New unbreakable encryption method
- From: Simon Johnson <simon.johnson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 01:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
I call the method "Perpetual One Time Pad", or POTP for short. I
considered calling it Perpetual One Use Pad, but I thought POUP wasn't
a good nickname for it:).
This scheme does not have the same security as the OTP. You can easily
see this because in the OTP each bit of the pad is a probability of
0.5 of being 0 or 1. The security proof for the OTP depends on the
fact that each bit of the pad is truly random.
In your scheme, with a given key and a given collection of pads, the
probability of a given bit being a zero or a one is certain; it's a
computation based upon the contents of the pad, key and message.
Your scheme is ambiguous and thus I can't comment further until source-
code is provided.
Simon.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New unbreakable encryption method
- From: Unruh
- Re: New unbreakable encryption method
- References:
- New unbreakable encryption method
- From: jlb
- New unbreakable encryption method
- Prev by Date: Re: New unbreakable encryption method
- Next by Date: Re: New unbreakable encryption method
- Previous by thread: Re: New unbreakable encryption method
- Next by thread: Re: New unbreakable encryption method
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|