Re: Non-Scalar Cryptography - The Emporor is stark naked.

biject wrote:
On May 12, 6:06 am, "Joseph Ashwood" <ashw...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
<austin.oby...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:0718ea2a-ed07-41cc-9b04-1dea259f2070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

As you've been told before, in particular by me. You have done nothing here
of any value. Let's just cover your specific claims in this set
"theoretically unbreakable"
It has a key, key is not infinite, therefore key can be bruteforced. I don't
even have to know what cipher it is to know that your opening claim is wrong


I hate the ADA language so did not look at his stuff. ADA is
nothing
compared to C++ but the facts you state above also apply equally well
to the short key crypto systems that are AES based. They also suffer
from a severely short key.

So they the guy may not have been totally correct it still may be
better
than AES which may have been designed to have some weakness that
few know about.

OK I'll call the loony bin for you. Please pack for a long stay.
.