Re: Non-Scalar Cryptography - The Emporor is stark naked.
- From: "Joseph Ashwood" <ashwood@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 05:06:14 -0700
<austin.obyrne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:0718ea2a-ed07-41cc-9b04-1dea259f2070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
As you've been told before, in particular by me. You have done nothing here of any value. Let's just cover your specific claims in this set
"theoretically unbreakable"
It has a key, key is not infinite, therefore key can be bruteforced. I don't even have to know what cipher it is to know that your opening claim is wrong
"industry and academia remain intractable to overtures for ... discussion on this matter"
Quite the contrary, we are very open to change, we simply look at your statements, prove you incorrect, and move on.
Since the rest of your message is completely worthless, I'll leave everyone with a simple statement taht if you are curious as to the failings, feel free to search google groups for the last conversation. To spoil the punchline the claim was made that vectors are not equivalent to scalars, by diagonalization they are exactly equal, any further examination of the claims is worthless.
Joe
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Non-Scalar Cryptography - The Emporor is stark naked.
- From: austin . obyrne
- Re: Non-Scalar Cryptography - The Emporor is stark naked.
- From: austin . obyrne
- Re: Non-Scalar Cryptography - The Emporor is stark naked.
- From: austin . obyrne
- Re: Non-Scalar Cryptography - The Emporor is stark naked.
- From: biject
- Re: Non-Scalar Cryptography - The Emporor is stark naked.
- References:
- Non-Scalar Cryptography - The Emporor is stark naked.
- From: austin . obyrne
- Non-Scalar Cryptography - The Emporor is stark naked.
- Prev by Date: Non-Scalar Cryptography - The Emporor is stark naked.
- Next by Date: Re: RSA ecnryption confusion
- Previous by thread: Non-Scalar Cryptography - The Emporor is stark naked.
- Next by thread: Re: Non-Scalar Cryptography - The Emporor is stark naked.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|