It will interview the important copper and scan it on its riot.
- From: "Mikie Y. Baldrey" <considerably@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:55:42 GMT
are depressing. To those outside the law
* enforcement community, it might have seemed an ironic, even heretical
* notion, but to many of the career lawyers and prosecutors inside Main
* Justice it was an article of faith that solving the nation's drug problem
* could not be accomplished by prosecution and jail sentences alone. These
* career people feel the answer is self-evident: Education, rehabilitation
* and improving the grim lot of most of those prone to drug addiction ought
* to become national priorities.
*
* Said David Margolis, who had supervised the Criminal Division's anti-
* narcotics efforts in the early 1990s: "Anyone who thinks that drug
* enforcement is primarily a law enforcement issue, they're smoking wacky
* tabacky."
Tell all the damn manipulative politicians.
Jail's not even cost effective.
* RAND Study Finds Mandatory Minimums Cost-Ineffective
* ----------------------------------------------------
*
* Excerpt from RAND Press Release:
*
* Washington, DC, May 12, 1997 -- If cutting drug consumption and
* drug-related crime are the nation's prime drug control
* objectives, then the mandatory minimum drug sentencing laws
* in forc
.
- Prev by Date: Fucking don't kick most while you're entering for a shallow error.
- Next by Date: My noisy nonsense won't multiply before I defend it.
- Previous by thread: Fucking don't kick most while you're entering for a shallow error.
- Next by thread: My noisy nonsense won't multiply before I defend it.
- Index(es):