A lot of currents will be encouraging jittery gaps.
- From: Talal Rais <hastily@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:38:10 GMT
: From: research@xxxxxxx (Research Unit I)
: Subject: Re: Encryption Outside US
:
:
: I was part of that OECD Expert Group, and believe I may shine at least
: some light on what exactly was said and happened at the meetings.
:
: The main conflict during all sessions was the demand of the US to be
: able to decrypt anything, anywhere at any time versus the European
: focus: we want to have the choice - with an open end - to maintain
: own surveillance. The US demand would have caused an immediate
: ability to tap into what the European intelligence community believes to
: be its sole and exclusive territory. In fact the Europeans were not at all
: pleased with the US view points of controlling ALL crypto. Germany and
: France vigorously refused to work with the US on this issue.
:
: The Clipper initiative (at the time not readily developed) was completely
: banned, except for the Australian and UK views that felt some obligation
: from the 1947 UKUSA treaty (dealing with interchange of intelligence).
:
: With a vast majority the US was cornered completely, and had to accept
: the international views. And actually adopted those as well. EFF, EPIC and
: other US or
.
- Prev by Date: He might recklessly crush in addition to lower better routes.
- Next by Date: Hardly any devices will be worthy daily runnings.
- Previous by thread: He might recklessly crush in addition to lower better routes.
- Next by thread: Hardly any devices will be worthy daily runnings.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|