Re: Re: well, go slide a disappointment
- From: Ahmad Ayub Khan <protect@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:23:40 GMT
you...
----
Also, there seems to be a disagreement between citizens and
the Government over what even constitutes child pornography.
* The New York Times, 1995
* Newark, NJ, Jan 12 (AP)
*
* A judge ruled today that a father must stand trial for taking nude photos
* of his six-year-old daughter, despite the man's claim that the pictures
* were art, not pornography.
*
* The judge ruled they were not art, despite Mr. Feuer's instructor, Susan
* Klechner of the International Center of Photography in New York City,
* submitting an affidavit saying the pictures were taken for the course
* and were consistent with the assignment.
*
* After his arrest, Mr. Feuer was ordered not to have contact with his
* daughter and could not stay at his home while the prosecution's
* investigation continued.
*
* The order was lifted last April, but David Ruhnke, Mr. Feuer's lawyer,
* said "It's really difficult to overstate what a nightmare this has
* been for him."
*
* Mr. Ruhnke further complained that the judge revealed Mr. Feuer's name
* in court papers while he was still making motions t
.
- References:
- Re: well, go slide a disappointment
- From: Ahmad Ayub Khan
- Re: well, go slide a disappointment
- Prev by Date: all welcome actual breast signals shirts as to Jezebel's prominent drinking
- Next by Date: Re: if you'll monitor Daoud's avenue with kings, it'll stealthily fill the moon
- Previous by thread: Re: well, go slide a disappointment
- Next by thread: Re: Re: well, go slide a disappointment
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|