Re: AES 256 key and anti-key



On Apr 4, 5:19 am, Ertugrul Söylemez <e...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
biject <biject.b...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes but that still leaves at least 2 way to pick which
permutaion to which key, I don't see where you get the idea that
you have to pick in a random way to allow for a nonzero chance of
repeat when its not nexessiary

That non-zero chance is a natural consequence of picking randomly.
The point is that picking randomly is the method with least possible
side effects. With every bit of structure you introduce, you give a
potential attacker information.

That is where we differ i think you can always decrease your set by
the amount of mappings that go to other keys. I agree that structure
in the permutations can be a weakness. But not allowing duplicate
mappings is not reduceing structure in my view. But maybe I am wrong.
But it appears so balck and white I am willing to live with the
difference until someone shows a proof or example where it would
weaken it.

Now tell me, how would you ensure/prove an injective mapping from a
large key-space to an even much more larger permutation-space (where
even the cardinality is such a large number that you couldn't store it)?
How would you keep that mapping pseudo-random at the same time?


I don't know how to tell if something like AES is designed in a way
that has it or not. I know that since scott19u can be run in a way
that it can produce every possible single cycle transform that It is
not hard to ensure no repeats. But its only for a 19bit sub-buffer.
For any actually file regardless of length not sure how many keys
would produce the same mappings for various files. I am not sure if
only allowing a single cycle is also bad for the way its used..

What I was wondering does anyone know if there are duplicate keys
that work exactly the same in AES I realize if there is that its
mostly likely a small subset. But either it has duplicates or it
doesn't since its fully defined. I also realize if it does its most
likely a very very small subset.



That isn't necessarily a contradiction, but really, how would you do it?
Do you see why I don't agree?

I think I am starting to see why you blieve an ideal cipher might
have there characteristics I don;t know how you know that AES has
this. unless there is a proof just for AES or if someone has actually
found two keys that map the same.


Regards,
Ertugrul.

--http://ertes.de/

David A. Scott
--
My Crypto code
http://bijective.dogma.net/crypto/scott19u.zip
http://www.jim.com/jamesd/Kong/scott19u.zip old version
My Compression code http://bijective.dogma.net/
**TO EMAIL ME drop the roman "five" **
Disclaimer:I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
made in the above text. For all I know I might be drugged.
As a famous person once said "any cryptograhic
system is only as strong as its weakest link"
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: AES cryptanalysis issues
    ... What I am stating is that one has to use a very small ... >> subset of the possible mappings in AES. ... First since only 2**128 keys there ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Brute Force bei WinZip (war: Brute Force - Geschwindigkeit)
    ... Du meinst jetzt ein RAR-Archiv mit AES? ... verwendete Hashfunktion aber nur 160 Bits. ... the resulting key space that can be as low as 160 bits. ... 256 bit AES keys are supported, users should be aware that these keys will not ...
    (de.comp.security.misc)
  • Re: Compression and crypto
    ... I stated that a one byte file could be easily decrypted using BICOM to ... random keys and eack time decrpt the one byte file using BICOM you will ... Well so far nobody has implemented QC for AES let alone BICOM so it's ... so that its it decrypts the 16 byte block. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: My little something...
    ... We where discussing about whether or not NSA could crack 80bit keys and I have proven you that they could. ... Suppose you used Snefru+Knufu as your ciphers. ... It's entirely possible that whatever attack renders AES ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Triple-AES
    ... Because I happen to have a source of large random keys ... I know that Triple-AES is at least as strong as 256 bit ... AES, and is quite likely to be far stronger. ...
    (sci.crypt)

Quantcast