Re: my KDF vs dictionary attacks
- From: David Eather <eather@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:05:17 +1000
Richard Herring wrote:
In message <13ucrp8lg88m003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Eather <eather@xxxxxxxxxx> writesI just thought of all the many first year engineering students who insisted on setting power supplies to 5.000 volts and rounded of to 2^33Bryan Olson wrote:David Eather wrote:To anyone else: Seriously I want some feedback, was what I posted to difficult / confused / obscure etc. to be useful? Yes my email address if you prefer.Giving a specific answer to a gibbering question is tricky business.
When the OP wrote, "the salt has 1 requirement, it must encrypt into a 32 character string, no more and no less, this means that the salt has a minimum of 5 digits and a maximum of 20 digits," did you understand what
he meant? I sure didn't.
I fell over that one as well.
What did you deduce from the weirdly precise
this provides 2^33.219279506322130890089774955278 salts
way of saying "slightly under 10^10"?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: my KDF vs dictionary attacks
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: my KDF vs dictionary attacks
- References:
- my KDF vs dictionary attacks
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: my KDF vs dictionary attacks
- From: David Eather
- Re: my KDF vs dictionary attacks
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: my KDF vs dictionary attacks
- From: David Eather
- Re: my KDF vs dictionary attacks
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: my KDF vs dictionary attacks
- From: David Eather
- Re: my KDF vs dictionary attacks
- From: Richard Herring
- my KDF vs dictionary attacks
- Prev by Date: Tooth Brushing between Medicine and Islam
- Next by Date: Re: El Gamal and Message Blocking
- Previous by thread: Re: my KDF vs dictionary attacks
- Next by thread: Re: my KDF vs dictionary attacks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|