Re: triple algorithms
- From: Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Feb 2008 09:50:21 -0800
Ertugrul Söylemez <es@xxxxxxxx> writes:
If you mean Shor's algorithm, we certainly don't know that it's
possible.
How come?
Nobody knows if it's physically possible to prepare the quantum states
that the algorithm needs. They are exponentially long vectors and
there may be some physical limits that stop quantum computing from
actually working. We don't have an experimental demonstration one way
or the other. We're in a situation sort of like Newtonian physics in
the 18th century, where it explains a lot, but it also predicts that
we can travel faster than light.
http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~oded/on-qc.html has some remarks.
Also, google the phrase "Sure-Shor separator" for a bunch more discussion.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: triple algorithms
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: triple algorithms
- References:
- triple algorithms
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: triple algorithms
- From: Simon Johnson
- Re: triple algorithms
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: triple algorithms
- From: Simon Johnson
- Re: triple algorithms
- From: Ertugrul Söylemez
- Re: triple algorithms
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: triple algorithms
- From: Ertugrul Söylemez
- triple algorithms
- Prev by Date: Re: Someone said 256 bits is not enough
- Next by Date: Re: triple algorithms
- Previous by thread: Re: triple algorithms
- Next by thread: Re: triple algorithms
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|