Re: Someone said 256 bits is not enough
- From: Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:55:43 -0800 (PST)
giorgio.tani wrote:
So, I guess what I'm trying to say is am I missing something or doesProbably.
it sound like the guy was just flat wrong?
The broadest consense in the community is: 128 bit are enough to
protect for 10-30 years of likely computing evolution
I do not agree with this statement in the slightest.
Even if Moore's law continues for another 30 years, 128 bits will be
well out of range.
Do the arithmetic.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Someone said 256 bits is not enough
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: Someone said 256 bits is not enough
- From: giorgio.tani
- Re: Someone said 256 bits is not enough
- References:
- Someone said 256 bits is not enough
- From: TomFoolery
- Re: Someone said 256 bits is not enough
- From: giorgio.tani
- Someone said 256 bits is not enough
- Prev by Date: Re: Someone said 256 bits is not enough
- Next by Date: Re: Someone said 256 bits is not enough
- Previous by thread: Re: Someone said 256 bits is not enough
- Next by thread: Re: Someone said 256 bits is not enough
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
