JSH: Understanding the double bind

There is overwhelming evidence that the research I have now should be
taken seriously, where the best evidence is the mathematical proof
itself that the factoring congruences I have do work.

But what I've been challenged with is providing a demonstration.

That may seem reasonable to you unless you understand that my claim is
that I found relatively simple mathematics that ends the viability of
RSA encryption, which is a statement now mostly backed by mathematical
proof.

So the request is to show that I did find mathematical proof, where
that proof is fairly trivial algebra, and DEMONSTRATE the failure of
the encryption system currently being used to move trillions of
dollars U.S. around the world.

There is no way that a sane and responsible cryptographic community
would want such a demonstration, so the rational among you may simply
choose to believe that there is no validity to my mathematical
research, no matter what I claim about mathematical proof.

Yet I suggest another explanation, where the reason the system can be
broken so easily is that it was never really all that good of an idea,
and the reason it went forward as supposedly a good idea is that the
people who are known as experts in crucial areas, are not actually,
and that through some kind of complicated things and others things not
so complicated, some people who I consider con artists gained critical
mass in key disciplines and used them to make money for nothing, but
got in way, way, way over their heads.

So now they just kind of sit because they have no clue what to do.

Now then, my problem is that many of you cannot be convinced by hard
evidence--except the demonstration that could be so dangerous--because
your critical faculties have been hijacked by a very twisted technique
where people you trust can cause what I call a buffer overflow of the
human mind by presenting you with seeming contradictions, so your
brain just kind of assumes the neocortex is screwing up--the newest
part of the brain--and awaits instructions from the group.

So you sit, and would not wake-up from this problem until overwhelming
evidence, or a more powerful group over-rode the commands from the
group you rely upon now.

It's a powerful technique that works only on people who trust you,
which explains, to give you another context, how George W. Bush
managed to not only invade Iraq, but maintain that invasion despite
the pretext being shown to be false, and still maintain control with
many in the US STILL believing that the original reasons for invasion
were valid.

The hijacking is extremely powerful and cannot be broken by reason
alone.

It is a way to gain complete control of otherwise highly intelligent
people and maintain that control indefinitely.

But they have to trust you.

To break this double-bind and regain your critical faculties, you only
have to suppose, just suppose, not believe, that maybe, just maybe top
mathematicians and cryptographers are not who they claim to be, and
that they are really con artists who are in way, way, way over their
heads, willing to let millions of people around the world suffer for
their failures, as that's what con artists would do, while in
contrast, true experts with moral fiber would do the right thing with
crucial mathematical research.

If you break the double-bind you may experience physical symptoms,
along with psychological ones including mild to moderate depression.
Physical symptoms may include headache and nausea. You may also feel
a need to isolate yourself and withdraw from your loved ones
temporarily and find your ability to trust others in general will be
affected.

Those should all pass with time.


James Harris
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: Step by step through the factoring algorithm
    ... It's one reason I'm less enthralled with the factoring research as I ... Yeah, I knew he had to be wrong, from the mathematical proof. ... It's why people who value mathematics say that proof is more important ... To the math, it's not about factoring D, as the math doesn't care. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Factoring RSA type prime products
    ... products of RSA type "two primes". ... and your algebra solution for the prime problem actually would be on a ... that the mathematics that I'm presenting is it. ... factoring problem based on mathematical proof. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Maxwells laws
    ... in the way of mathematical proof. ... not saying it isn't, I'm saying show me. ... This time I gave the basis of the mathematics, I gave a array of full ...
    (rec.radio.amateur.antenna)
  • JSH: Playing with infinities
    ... It just so happens that the mathematics works out that the non-trivial ... complete in that it must give a factorization of M. ... That set of rational solutions for y represents the intersection of two ... supposedly mathematical proof is what matters to you. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Playing with infinities
    ... > It just so happens that the mathematics works out that the non-trivial ... > complete in that it must give a factorization of M. ... > mathematical proof, then you are complete frauds, and must be, as ... > supposedly mathematical proof is what matters to you. ...
    (sci.math)