Re: Should be interesting

From: "Anonymous." <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 21:38:14 -0000

"Anonymous." <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:fliauk$pkm$1@xxxxxxxxxxx

"JSH" <jstevh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:469b95e6-69e2-4631-bb58-5e8ba244c68d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Any of you ever consider that a mathematical breakthrough that
completely changed the scene on RSA encryption could be found and
there be quiet?

I have also mused that the way in which the Britland and Yankland
governments attempt to sell us these technologies as uncrackable
is because they _ARE_ crackable by those in the know?

Hmmmmm ...... line got tapped at about 21:15

.

References:
- JSH: Should be interesting
  - From: JSH
- Re: Should be interesting
  - From: Anonymous.

Prev by Date: Re: non-NP-completeness of block ciphers?
Next by Date: Re: JSH: Necessity and discovery
Previous by thread: Re: Should be interesting
Next by thread: Re: Should be interesting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Should be interesting
... completely changed the scene on RSA encryption could be found and ... I have also mused that the way in which the Britland and Yankland ... you'd never have enough time to match up the co-operating prime ...
(sci.crypt)
Re: JSH: Should be interesting
... completely changed the scene on RSA encryption could be found and ... there be quiet? ... You've never shown any "breakthrough". ... ANY numbers with your "algorithms". ...
(sci.crypt)