almost no operational eventual temple fishs advertisements no doubt Sharon's specified merchant

leave no mark which endures longer
than, say, an hour or two but which will make sitting down an
uncomfortable proposition for a comparable length of time, blows which
are an inescapable consequence of failing to heed the verbal --that's
enough-- seem the only sensible way to evenly balance the unfair
advantage emotion has over reason. This, to me, falls well short of
actual physical abuse but exists well within the upper registers of
--attention-getting devices-- for those women and children who have
proven themselves to be of inadequate and/or unfocussed attentions.

Of course, in our present society, with its feminist-infected judiciary,
any husband/father following this sensible course of action would very
quickly run afoul of the voodoo profession and the law and find himself
up on charges of common assault or domestic violence and (more likely as
not) sentenced to --ist-- style --re-education-- in the feminist way of
doing things. In our feminist-infected, feminist-misdirected society the
husband/father really has only two courses of action open to him: a)
capitulate to feminism or b) leave.

I think it safe to say that women/feminists -- having adopted Impossible
Things to Believe Before Breakfast numbers 15 and 16 (collect them all!)
in place of verbal and physical discipline for their children (and in
light of that 35% increase in Youth Crime) -- have demonstrated that they
are incapable of either understanding or administering discipline.

Slow-witted to the point of catatonia as feminists have, time and again,
proven themselves to be when their emotions tell them one thing
(--absolute freedom makes children happy--) and reason tells them



.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast