Re: Spam research....No, not the canned meat....
- From: cobalt <cobalt327@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:13:38 GMT
was big enough that "An
* individual may not legitimately demand privacy for activities conducted
* out of doors in fields," the Court wrote, "except in the area immediately
* surrounding the home."
*
* ...then the Supreme Court ruled that a barn sixty yards from a farmhouse
* was too far away from a house to expect privacy.
*
* ...then the Supreme Court ruled that aerial surveillance did not constitute
* a Fourth Amendment search.
*
* ...then the Supreme Court ruled that a "precision aerial mapping camera"
* that was able to capture objects as small as one-half inch in diameter did
* not constitute a Fourth Amendment search.
...then courts ruled that infrared surveillance of homes was permissible.
What is this?
* Subject: Re: Law Enforcement Aviation
* From: aufsj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
* Date: 1996/12/27
* Newsgroups: rec.aviation.military
*
* What interests me is how new technologies will be interpreted. I recently
* inquired at the local Law School about the courts views towards the use
* of impulse radar, and they said "Impulse what the heck?"
*
* Basically it is a radar that "sees through" things (like, say, your
* house).
*
* Their capabilities vary widely, bu
.
- Prev by Date: Re: zzz Yet Another Teacher's "Tail" : The Back End of Bobby (or, Physician, Spank Thyself) (RL)
- Next by Date: Re: If Camilla and Charles Married After 1970, What Would the Royal Family Be Like?
- Previous by thread: Re: Spam research....No, not the canned meat....
- Next by thread: Re: Bicycle riders will get more respect once they start obeying the laws that govern them.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
