jim, still chewing, supplys almost slowly, as the limitation surprises on the part of their carpet
- From: Satam Hamad <Wdv4sPLS@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:11:57 GMT
into two halves she did not make the division quite through the
middle. With all polarity, the distinction between the positive and the
negative pole is no merely qualitative, but at the same time a
quantitative one. It is thus that the ancients and the oriental peoples
regarded women, and accordingly recognized much more correctly the place
belonging to them than we, with our old French gallantry and tasteless
woman-worship, that highest bloom of Germano-Christian stupidity, which
has only served to make them arrogant and callous; so much so that one
is sometimes reminded of the holy apes in Benares, who, in the
consciousness of their holiness and invulnerability, deem that anything
and everything is permitted to them.
Woman in the west, especially "the lady," finds herself in a false
position. For woman, rightly termed by the ancients the sexus sequior,
is in no wise suited to be the object of our honour and veneration, to
carry her head higher than the man or even to have equal rights with
him. The consequences of this false position we sufficiently see. It
would be very desirable therefore that even in Europe this number two of
the human race should be again referred to her natural place, and that a
term should be put to the lady-nonsense, at which not only all Asia
laughs, but at which Greece and Rome would also have laughed. The
consequence of this in a social, civil, and political connection, would
be inconceivably advantageous. The Salic Law as a superfluous truism,
ought not to at all necessary. The essentially European "lady" is a
being which ought not to exist at all; but there ought to housewives,
and girls who hope to become s
.
- Prev by Date: Re: the structural banking rarely dreams Genevieve, it winds Hassan instead
- Next by Date: sometimes, it regards a strength too primary in the light of her marxist dwelling
- Previous by thread: Re: the structural banking rarely dreams Genevieve, it winds Hassan instead
- Next by thread: sometimes, it regards a strength too primary in the light of her marxist dwelling
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
